TY - JOUR
T1 - Exploring the effects of nitrogen fertilization management alternatives on nitrate loss and crop yields in tile-drained fields in Illinois
AU - Jeong, Hanseok
AU - Bhattarai, Rabin
N1 - Funding Information:
The data used in this publication from the Little Vermilion River Watershed was a contribution of the Illinois Agricultural Experiment Station, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign as a part of Projects 10-309 and 10-301 and Southern Regional Research Project S-1004 (formerly S-249 and S-273). Supported in part with funds from USDA-CSREES under special projects 91-EHUA-1-0040 and 95-EHUA-1-0123 , NRI project 9501781 , and Special Project 95-34214-2266 (Purdue sub-contract 590-1145-2417-01 ). In addition, this work was supported with funds from the Illinois Council on Food and Agricultural Research and with the assistance of the Champaign County Soil and Water Conservation District, which sponsored the installation of the County Line gaging station. Faculty from the Department of Agricultural Engineering supervising the collection and reduction of these data were: J. K. Mitchell, M. C. Hirschi, P. Kalita, and R. A.C. Cooke. This work was also partially supported by the USDA National Institute of Food and Agriculture, Hatch project ILLU-741-379.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2018 Elsevier Ltd
PY - 2018/5/1
Y1 - 2018/5/1
N2 - It is vital to manage the excessive use of nitrogen (N) fertilizer in corn production, the single largest consumer of N fertilizer in the United States, in order to achieve more sustainable agroecosystems. This study comprehensively explored the effects of N fertilization alternatives on nitrate loss and crop yields using the Root Zone Water Quality Model (RZWQM) in tile-drained fields in central Illinois. The RZWQM was tested for the prediction of tile flow, nitrate loss, and crop yields using eight years (1993–2000) of observed data and showed satisfactory model performances from statistical and graphical evaluations. Our model simulations demonstrated the maximum return to nitrogen (MRTN) rate (193 kgha−1), a newly advised N recommendation by the Illinois Nutrient Loss Reduction Strategy (INLRS), can be further reduced. Nitrate loss was reduced by 10.3% and 29.8%, but corn yields decreased by 0.3% and 1.9% at 156 and 150 kgha−1 of N fertilizer rate in the study sites A and E, respectively. Although adjustment of N fertilization timing presented a further reduction in nitrate loss, there was no optimal timing to ensure nitrate loss reduction and corn productivity. For site A, 100% spring application was the most productive and 40% fall, 10% pre-plant, and 50% side dress application generated the lowest nitrate loss. For site E, the conventional N application timing was verified as the best practice in both corn production and nitrate loss reduction. Compared to surface broadcast placement, injected N fertilizer in spring increased corn yield, but may also escalate nitrate loss. This study presented the need of an adaptive N fertilizer management due to the heterogeneity in agricultural systems, and raised the importance of timing and placement of N fertilizer, as well as further reduction in fertilizer rate to devise a better in-field N management practice.
AB - It is vital to manage the excessive use of nitrogen (N) fertilizer in corn production, the single largest consumer of N fertilizer in the United States, in order to achieve more sustainable agroecosystems. This study comprehensively explored the effects of N fertilization alternatives on nitrate loss and crop yields using the Root Zone Water Quality Model (RZWQM) in tile-drained fields in central Illinois. The RZWQM was tested for the prediction of tile flow, nitrate loss, and crop yields using eight years (1993–2000) of observed data and showed satisfactory model performances from statistical and graphical evaluations. Our model simulations demonstrated the maximum return to nitrogen (MRTN) rate (193 kgha−1), a newly advised N recommendation by the Illinois Nutrient Loss Reduction Strategy (INLRS), can be further reduced. Nitrate loss was reduced by 10.3% and 29.8%, but corn yields decreased by 0.3% and 1.9% at 156 and 150 kgha−1 of N fertilizer rate in the study sites A and E, respectively. Although adjustment of N fertilization timing presented a further reduction in nitrate loss, there was no optimal timing to ensure nitrate loss reduction and corn productivity. For site A, 100% spring application was the most productive and 40% fall, 10% pre-plant, and 50% side dress application generated the lowest nitrate loss. For site E, the conventional N application timing was verified as the best practice in both corn production and nitrate loss reduction. Compared to surface broadcast placement, injected N fertilizer in spring increased corn yield, but may also escalate nitrate loss. This study presented the need of an adaptive N fertilizer management due to the heterogeneity in agricultural systems, and raised the importance of timing and placement of N fertilizer, as well as further reduction in fertilizer rate to devise a better in-field N management practice.
KW - Best management practices
KW - DSSAT
KW - Maximum return to nitrogen
KW - Nitrate loss
KW - RZWQM
KW - Tile flow
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85042711666&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85042711666&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.02.062
DO - 10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.02.062
M3 - Article
C2 - 29502019
AN - SCOPUS:85042711666
SN - 0301-4797
VL - 213
SP - 341
EP - 352
JO - Journal of Environmental Management
JF - Journal of Environmental Management
ER -