TY - JOUR
T1 - Exploring Instructors’ Views on Fine-Tuned Generative AI Feedback in Higher Education
AU - Tzirides, Anastasia Olga
AU - Zapata, Gabriela
AU - Bolger, Patrick
AU - Cope, Bill
AU - Kalantzis, Mary
AU - Searsmith, Duane
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2024, Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education. All rights reserved.
PY - 2024
Y1 - 2024
N2 - This paper explores the integration of Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) feedback into higher education. Specifically, it examines the views of 11 experienced instructors on fine-tuned GenAI formative feedback of student works in an online graduate program in the United States. The participants assessed sample GenAI reviews, and their perspec tives were recorded through numerical, best-adjective, and open-ended surveys. The findings revealed pervasively positive views across the AI feedback. Numerical survey results showed that the feedback was generally deemed relevant, clear, actionable, useful, and comprehensive. The best-adjective survey further specified the nature of these views. Openended responses supported both findings, suggesting that GenAI feedback aligned well with course rubrics and provided actionable suggestions. Nevertheless, some limitations were identified, such as redundancy and how lengthy suggestions could overwhelm students. The study offers suggestions for the improvement of fine-tuned GenAI feedback to improve its effectiveness and enhance higher education students’ learning experiences, especially in online settings.
AB - This paper explores the integration of Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) feedback into higher education. Specifically, it examines the views of 11 experienced instructors on fine-tuned GenAI formative feedback of student works in an online graduate program in the United States. The participants assessed sample GenAI reviews, and their perspec tives were recorded through numerical, best-adjective, and open-ended surveys. The findings revealed pervasively positive views across the AI feedback. Numerical survey results showed that the feedback was generally deemed relevant, clear, actionable, useful, and comprehensive. The best-adjective survey further specified the nature of these views. Openended responses supported both findings, suggesting that GenAI feedback aligned well with course rubrics and provided actionable suggestions. Nevertheless, some limitations were identified, such as redundancy and how lengthy suggestions could overwhelm students. The study offers suggestions for the improvement of fine-tuned GenAI feedback to improve its effectiveness and enhance higher education students’ learning experiences, especially in online settings.
KW - Fine-tuned Generative AI
KW - Formative Feedback
KW - Instructors’ Views
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85214096140&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85214096140&partnerID=8YFLogxK
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85214096140
SN - 1537-2456
VL - 23
SP - 319
EP - 334
JO - International Journal on E-Learning: Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education
JF - International Journal on E-Learning: Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education
IS - 3
ER -