Explanation, Entailment, and Leibnizian Cosmological Arguments

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review


I argue that there are Leibnizian-style cosmological arguments for the existence of God which start from very mild premises which affirm the mere possibility of a principle of sufficient reason. The utilization of such premises gives a great deal of plausibility to such types of argumentation. I spend the majority of the paper defending three major objections to such “mild” premises viz., a reductio argument from Peter van Inwagen and William Rowe, which proffers and defends the idea that a necessary proposition cannot explain a contingent one. I, then, turn to an amelioration of the Rowe/van Inwagen argument which attempts to appeal to an entailment relation between explanans and explanandum that is fettered out in terms of relevance logic. Subsequent to dispelling with that worry, I tackle objections to the utilization of weak principles of sufficient reason that depend essentially upon agglomerative accounts of explanation.
Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)97-108
Issue number1
StatePublished - Apr 1 2009


  • explanation
  • entailment
  • implication
  • God


Dive into the research topics of 'Explanation, Entailment, and Leibnizian Cosmological Arguments'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this