Explaining the (De)valuation of Process Experts in Contemporary Organizations

Jeffrey W. Treem, William C. Barley

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Abstract

This chapter introduces the concept of process expertise to refer to a form of expertise individuals may enact in managing information and communication both within and across specialist domains but which does not, in itself, represent those domains’ practices. An argument is made that the value of workers who apply this expertise (e.g. process experts) is often overlooked because people are conditioned to value work practices that are visibly associated with exclusive forms of domain knowledge. Four different forms of processes are identified as representative of process expertise: operational processes, curational processes, evaluative processes, and representational processes. Process expertise is valuable for individuals because it is transferable across organizational contexts, and is valuable for organizations because it complements or amplifies the contributions of specialist experts. Developing theory that incorporates process expertise will help communication scholars interrogate questions related to the authority, visibility, materiality, and exclusivity of work practices.
Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publicationExpertise, Communication, and Organizing
EditorsJeffrey W. Treem, Paul M. Leonardi
PublisherOxford University Press
Pages213-231
ISBN (Electronic)9780198739227
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 1 2016

Fingerprint

expert
expertise
communication
Values
worker
knowledge

Keywords

  • experts
  • expertise
  • process
  • domain expertise
  • value
  • work
  • transferability

Cite this

Treem, J. W., & Barley, W. C. (2016). Explaining the (De)valuation of Process Experts in Contemporary Organizations. In J. W. Treem, & P. M. Leonardi (Eds.), Expertise, Communication, and Organizing (pp. 213-231). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198739227.003.0011

Explaining the (De)valuation of Process Experts in Contemporary Organizations. / Treem, Jeffrey W.; Barley, William C.

Expertise, Communication, and Organizing. ed. / Jeffrey W. Treem; Paul M. Leonardi. Oxford University Press, 2016. p. 213-231.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Treem, JW & Barley, WC 2016, Explaining the (De)valuation of Process Experts in Contemporary Organizations. in JW Treem & PM Leonardi (eds), Expertise, Communication, and Organizing. Oxford University Press, pp. 213-231. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198739227.003.0011
Treem JW, Barley WC. Explaining the (De)valuation of Process Experts in Contemporary Organizations. In Treem JW, Leonardi PM, editors, Expertise, Communication, and Organizing. Oxford University Press. 2016. p. 213-231 https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198739227.003.0011
Treem, Jeffrey W. ; Barley, William C. / Explaining the (De)valuation of Process Experts in Contemporary Organizations. Expertise, Communication, and Organizing. editor / Jeffrey W. Treem ; Paul M. Leonardi. Oxford University Press, 2016. pp. 213-231
@inbook{3a3554a55235478e9648b59950c01708,
title = "Explaining the (De)valuation of Process Experts in Contemporary Organizations",
abstract = "This chapter introduces the concept of process expertise to refer to a form of expertise individuals may enact in managing information and communication both within and across specialist domains but which does not, in itself, represent those domains’ practices. An argument is made that the value of workers who apply this expertise (e.g. process experts) is often overlooked because people are conditioned to value work practices that are visibly associated with exclusive forms of domain knowledge. Four different forms of processes are identified as representative of process expertise: operational processes, curational processes, evaluative processes, and representational processes. Process expertise is valuable for individuals because it is transferable across organizational contexts, and is valuable for organizations because it complements or amplifies the contributions of specialist experts. Developing theory that incorporates process expertise will help communication scholars interrogate questions related to the authority, visibility, materiality, and exclusivity of work practices.",
keywords = "experts, expertise, process, domain expertise, value, work, transferability",
author = "Treem, {Jeffrey W.} and Barley, {William C.}",
year = "2016",
month = "6",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198739227.003.0011",
language = "English (US)",
pages = "213--231",
editor = "Treem, {Jeffrey W.} and Leonardi, {Paul M.}",
booktitle = "Expertise, Communication, and Organizing",
publisher = "Oxford University Press",

}

TY - CHAP

T1 - Explaining the (De)valuation of Process Experts in Contemporary Organizations

AU - Treem, Jeffrey W.

AU - Barley, William C.

PY - 2016/6/1

Y1 - 2016/6/1

N2 - This chapter introduces the concept of process expertise to refer to a form of expertise individuals may enact in managing information and communication both within and across specialist domains but which does not, in itself, represent those domains’ practices. An argument is made that the value of workers who apply this expertise (e.g. process experts) is often overlooked because people are conditioned to value work practices that are visibly associated with exclusive forms of domain knowledge. Four different forms of processes are identified as representative of process expertise: operational processes, curational processes, evaluative processes, and representational processes. Process expertise is valuable for individuals because it is transferable across organizational contexts, and is valuable for organizations because it complements or amplifies the contributions of specialist experts. Developing theory that incorporates process expertise will help communication scholars interrogate questions related to the authority, visibility, materiality, and exclusivity of work practices.

AB - This chapter introduces the concept of process expertise to refer to a form of expertise individuals may enact in managing information and communication both within and across specialist domains but which does not, in itself, represent those domains’ practices. An argument is made that the value of workers who apply this expertise (e.g. process experts) is often overlooked because people are conditioned to value work practices that are visibly associated with exclusive forms of domain knowledge. Four different forms of processes are identified as representative of process expertise: operational processes, curational processes, evaluative processes, and representational processes. Process expertise is valuable for individuals because it is transferable across organizational contexts, and is valuable for organizations because it complements or amplifies the contributions of specialist experts. Developing theory that incorporates process expertise will help communication scholars interrogate questions related to the authority, visibility, materiality, and exclusivity of work practices.

KW - experts

KW - expertise

KW - process

KW - domain expertise

KW - value

KW - work

KW - transferability

U2 - 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198739227.003.0011

DO - 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198739227.003.0011

M3 - Chapter

SP - 213

EP - 231

BT - Expertise, Communication, and Organizing

A2 - Treem, Jeffrey W.

A2 - Leonardi, Paul M.

PB - Oxford University Press

ER -