Expectations of brilliance underlie gender distributions across academic disciplines

Sarah Jane Leslie, Andrei Cimpian, Meredith Meyer, Edward Freeland

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

The gender imbalance in STEM subjects dominates current debates about women's underrepresentation in academia. However, women are well represented at the Ph.D. level in some sciences and poorly represented in some humanities (e.g., in 2011, 54% of U.S. Ph. D.'s in molecular biology were women versus only 31% in philosophy). We hypothesize that, across the academic spectrum, women are underrepresented in fields whose practitioners believe that raw, innate talent is the main requirement for success, because women are stereotyped as not possessing such talent. This hypothesis extends to African Americans' underrepresentation as well, as this group is subject to similar stereotypes. Results from a nationwide survey of academics support our hypothesis (termed the field-specific ability beliefs hypothesis) over three competing hypotheses.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)262-265
Number of pages4
JournalScience
Volume347
Issue number6219
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 16 2015

Fingerprint

Aptitude
Scanning Transmission Electron Microscopy
African Americans
Molecular Biology

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • General

Cite this

Expectations of brilliance underlie gender distributions across academic disciplines. / Leslie, Sarah Jane; Cimpian, Andrei; Meyer, Meredith; Freeland, Edward.

In: Science, Vol. 347, No. 6219, 16.01.2015, p. 262-265.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Leslie, SJ, Cimpian, A, Meyer, M & Freeland, E 2015, 'Expectations of brilliance underlie gender distributions across academic disciplines', Science, vol. 347, no. 6219, pp. 262-265. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1261375
Leslie, Sarah Jane ; Cimpian, Andrei ; Meyer, Meredith ; Freeland, Edward. / Expectations of brilliance underlie gender distributions across academic disciplines. In: Science. 2015 ; Vol. 347, No. 6219. pp. 262-265.
@article{80af3a4188e34e378027a7190e558627,
title = "Expectations of brilliance underlie gender distributions across academic disciplines",
abstract = "The gender imbalance in STEM subjects dominates current debates about women's underrepresentation in academia. However, women are well represented at the Ph.D. level in some sciences and poorly represented in some humanities (e.g., in 2011, 54{\%} of U.S. Ph. D.'s in molecular biology were women versus only 31{\%} in philosophy). We hypothesize that, across the academic spectrum, women are underrepresented in fields whose practitioners believe that raw, innate talent is the main requirement for success, because women are stereotyped as not possessing such talent. This hypothesis extends to African Americans' underrepresentation as well, as this group is subject to similar stereotypes. Results from a nationwide survey of academics support our hypothesis (termed the field-specific ability beliefs hypothesis) over three competing hypotheses.",
author = "Leslie, {Sarah Jane} and Andrei Cimpian and Meredith Meyer and Edward Freeland",
year = "2015",
month = "1",
day = "16",
doi = "10.1126/science.1261375",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "347",
pages = "262--265",
journal = "Science",
issn = "0036-8075",
publisher = "American Association for the Advancement of Science",
number = "6219",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Expectations of brilliance underlie gender distributions across academic disciplines

AU - Leslie, Sarah Jane

AU - Cimpian, Andrei

AU - Meyer, Meredith

AU - Freeland, Edward

PY - 2015/1/16

Y1 - 2015/1/16

N2 - The gender imbalance in STEM subjects dominates current debates about women's underrepresentation in academia. However, women are well represented at the Ph.D. level in some sciences and poorly represented in some humanities (e.g., in 2011, 54% of U.S. Ph. D.'s in molecular biology were women versus only 31% in philosophy). We hypothesize that, across the academic spectrum, women are underrepresented in fields whose practitioners believe that raw, innate talent is the main requirement for success, because women are stereotyped as not possessing such talent. This hypothesis extends to African Americans' underrepresentation as well, as this group is subject to similar stereotypes. Results from a nationwide survey of academics support our hypothesis (termed the field-specific ability beliefs hypothesis) over three competing hypotheses.

AB - The gender imbalance in STEM subjects dominates current debates about women's underrepresentation in academia. However, women are well represented at the Ph.D. level in some sciences and poorly represented in some humanities (e.g., in 2011, 54% of U.S. Ph. D.'s in molecular biology were women versus only 31% in philosophy). We hypothesize that, across the academic spectrum, women are underrepresented in fields whose practitioners believe that raw, innate talent is the main requirement for success, because women are stereotyped as not possessing such talent. This hypothesis extends to African Americans' underrepresentation as well, as this group is subject to similar stereotypes. Results from a nationwide survey of academics support our hypothesis (termed the field-specific ability beliefs hypothesis) over three competing hypotheses.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84922480048&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84922480048&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1126/science.1261375

DO - 10.1126/science.1261375

M3 - Article

VL - 347

SP - 262

EP - 265

JO - Science

JF - Science

SN - 0036-8075

IS - 6219

ER -