TY - JOUR
T1 - Expanding the role of reactive transport models in critical zone processes
AU - Li, Li
AU - Maher, Kate
AU - Navarre-Sitchler, Alexis
AU - Druhan, Jenny
AU - Meile, Christof
AU - Lawrence, Corey
AU - Moore, Joel
AU - Perdrial, Julia
AU - Sullivan, Pamela
AU - Thompson, Aaron
AU - Jin, Lixin
AU - Bolton, Edward W.
AU - Brantley, Susan L.
AU - Dietrich, William E.
AU - Mayer, K. Ulrich
AU - Steefel, Carl I.
AU - Valocchi, Albert
AU - Zachara, John
AU - Kocar, Benjamin
AU - Mcintosh, Jennifer
AU - Tutolo, Benjamin M.
AU - Kumar, Mukesh
AU - Sonnenthal, Eric
AU - Bao, Chen
AU - Beisman, Joe
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2016 Elsevier B.V.
PY - 2017/2/1
Y1 - 2017/2/1
N2 - Models test our understanding of processes and can reach beyond the spatial and temporal scales of measurements. Multi-component Reactive Transport Models (RTMs), initially developed more than three decades ago, have been used extensively to explore the interactions of geothermal, hydrologic, geochemical, and geobiological processes in subsurface systems. Driven by extensive data sets now available from intensive measurement efforts, there is a pressing need to couple RTMs with other community models to explore non-linear interactions among the atmosphere, hydrosphere, biosphere, and geosphere. Here we briefly review the history of RTM development, summarize the current state of RTM approaches, and identify new research directions, opportunities, and infrastructure needs to broaden the use of RTMs. In particular, we envision the expanded use of RTMs in advancing process understanding in the Critical Zone, the veneer of the Earth that extends from the top of vegetation to the bottom of groundwater. We argue that, although parsimonious models are essential at larger scales, process-based models offer tools to explore the highly nonlinear coupling that characterizes natural systems. We present seven testable hypotheses that emphasize the unique capabilities of process-based RTMs for (1) elucidating chemical weathering and its physical and biogeochemical drivers; (2) understanding the interactions among roots, micro-organisms, carbon, water, and minerals in the rhizosphere; (3) assessing the effects of heterogeneity across spatial and temporal scales; and (4) integrating the vast quantity of novel data, including “omics” data (genomics, transcriptomics, proteomics, metabolomics), elemental concentration and speciation data, and isotope data into our understanding of complex earth surface systems. With strong support from data-driven sciences, we are now in an exciting era where integration of RTM framework into other community models will facilitate process understanding across disciplines and across scales.
AB - Models test our understanding of processes and can reach beyond the spatial and temporal scales of measurements. Multi-component Reactive Transport Models (RTMs), initially developed more than three decades ago, have been used extensively to explore the interactions of geothermal, hydrologic, geochemical, and geobiological processes in subsurface systems. Driven by extensive data sets now available from intensive measurement efforts, there is a pressing need to couple RTMs with other community models to explore non-linear interactions among the atmosphere, hydrosphere, biosphere, and geosphere. Here we briefly review the history of RTM development, summarize the current state of RTM approaches, and identify new research directions, opportunities, and infrastructure needs to broaden the use of RTMs. In particular, we envision the expanded use of RTMs in advancing process understanding in the Critical Zone, the veneer of the Earth that extends from the top of vegetation to the bottom of groundwater. We argue that, although parsimonious models are essential at larger scales, process-based models offer tools to explore the highly nonlinear coupling that characterizes natural systems. We present seven testable hypotheses that emphasize the unique capabilities of process-based RTMs for (1) elucidating chemical weathering and its physical and biogeochemical drivers; (2) understanding the interactions among roots, micro-organisms, carbon, water, and minerals in the rhizosphere; (3) assessing the effects of heterogeneity across spatial and temporal scales; and (4) integrating the vast quantity of novel data, including “omics” data (genomics, transcriptomics, proteomics, metabolomics), elemental concentration and speciation data, and isotope data into our understanding of complex earth surface systems. With strong support from data-driven sciences, we are now in an exciting era where integration of RTM framework into other community models will facilitate process understanding across disciplines and across scales.
KW - Biogeochemical processes
KW - Chemical weathering
KW - Critical Zone Processes
KW - Hydrological cycles
KW - Isotopes
KW - Reactive transport models
KW - Root zone
KW - Spatial heterogeneity
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85011798287&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85011798287&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.earscirev.2016.09.001
DO - 10.1016/j.earscirev.2016.09.001
M3 - Review article
AN - SCOPUS:85011798287
SN - 0012-8252
VL - 165
SP - 280
EP - 301
JO - Earth-Science Reviews
JF - Earth-Science Reviews
ER -