Expanding horizons: Can women's support groups diversify peer networks in rural India?

Eeshani Kandpal, Kathy Baylis

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Montgomery and Casterline distinguish between two key effects of social networks: information and influence. In both cases, homophily-induced homogeneous networks may limit the network's ability to affect social norms or at least delay the process, since information and social norms are likely already common to the network, and may well presumably be reinforced instead of challenged by network connections. In India, in particular, the hierarchical structure imposed by the caste system means that peer networks are often restricted by caste. These constraints can potentially limit women's interactions to a small subset of the community. Uttarakhand is in the Indian Himalayas; villages tend to be remote and are often without basic infrastructural facilities, like government schools and hospitals. Small, scattered villages without access to roads conspire to limit the diversity of social contact. Most villages are remote and many lack basic infrastructure such as schools and hospitals.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)360-367
Number of pages8
JournalAmerican Journal of Agricultural Economics
Volume95
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2013

Fingerprint

Self-Help Groups
peers
Social Class
villages
India
Aptitude
Social Support
social networks
infrastructure
roads
Social Norms
Peers
Rural India
Caste
Social norms

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Agricultural and Biological Sciences (miscellaneous)
  • Economics and Econometrics

Cite this

Expanding horizons : Can women's support groups diversify peer networks in rural India? / Kandpal, Eeshani; Baylis, Kathy.

In: American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Vol. 95, No. 2, 01.01.2013, p. 360-367.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{3743e5e4c3ff43ceabbfe42f34c206ca,
title = "Expanding horizons: Can women's support groups diversify peer networks in rural India?",
abstract = "Montgomery and Casterline distinguish between two key effects of social networks: information and influence. In both cases, homophily-induced homogeneous networks may limit the network's ability to affect social norms or at least delay the process, since information and social norms are likely already common to the network, and may well presumably be reinforced instead of challenged by network connections. In India, in particular, the hierarchical structure imposed by the caste system means that peer networks are often restricted by caste. These constraints can potentially limit women's interactions to a small subset of the community. Uttarakhand is in the Indian Himalayas; villages tend to be remote and are often without basic infrastructural facilities, like government schools and hospitals. Small, scattered villages without access to roads conspire to limit the diversity of social contact. Most villages are remote and many lack basic infrastructure such as schools and hospitals.",
author = "Eeshani Kandpal and Kathy Baylis",
year = "2013",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1093/ajae/aas052",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "95",
pages = "360--367",
journal = "American Journal of Agricultural Economics",
issn = "0002-9092",
publisher = "Oxford University Press",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Expanding horizons

T2 - Can women's support groups diversify peer networks in rural India?

AU - Kandpal, Eeshani

AU - Baylis, Kathy

PY - 2013/1/1

Y1 - 2013/1/1

N2 - Montgomery and Casterline distinguish between two key effects of social networks: information and influence. In both cases, homophily-induced homogeneous networks may limit the network's ability to affect social norms or at least delay the process, since information and social norms are likely already common to the network, and may well presumably be reinforced instead of challenged by network connections. In India, in particular, the hierarchical structure imposed by the caste system means that peer networks are often restricted by caste. These constraints can potentially limit women's interactions to a small subset of the community. Uttarakhand is in the Indian Himalayas; villages tend to be remote and are often without basic infrastructural facilities, like government schools and hospitals. Small, scattered villages without access to roads conspire to limit the diversity of social contact. Most villages are remote and many lack basic infrastructure such as schools and hospitals.

AB - Montgomery and Casterline distinguish between two key effects of social networks: information and influence. In both cases, homophily-induced homogeneous networks may limit the network's ability to affect social norms or at least delay the process, since information and social norms are likely already common to the network, and may well presumably be reinforced instead of challenged by network connections. In India, in particular, the hierarchical structure imposed by the caste system means that peer networks are often restricted by caste. These constraints can potentially limit women's interactions to a small subset of the community. Uttarakhand is in the Indian Himalayas; villages tend to be remote and are often without basic infrastructural facilities, like government schools and hospitals. Small, scattered villages without access to roads conspire to limit the diversity of social contact. Most villages are remote and many lack basic infrastructure such as schools and hospitals.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84872745925&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84872745925&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1093/ajae/aas052

DO - 10.1093/ajae/aas052

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84872745925

VL - 95

SP - 360

EP - 367

JO - American Journal of Agricultural Economics

JF - American Journal of Agricultural Economics

SN - 0002-9092

IS - 2

ER -