Excavating communities: Lewis R. Binford and the interpretation of the archaeological record in Illinois

Thomas E Emerson, Dale L. McElrath

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Lewis Binford’s contributions to field archaeology have been largely ignored in favor of his many contributions to theoretical issues dominating the discipline of archaeology at the end of the twentieth century. We examine Binford’s excavation methods in southern Illinois in the early 1960s and demonstrate how his considered approach served to systematize large-scale site excavation procedures. He adopted the time-honored tool of the salvage archaeologist—heavy equipment—and unapologetically employed it in a fundamentally new way, proving it to be a tool that served the greater goals of archaeological research. We trace the development of field methods and theoretical approaches in two case studies of Illinois archaeology and demonstrate how Binford’s contributions have been incorporated or rejected by subsequent CRM researchers.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)244-265
Number of pages22
JournalMidcontinental Journal of Archaeology
Volume42
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2017

Fingerprint

archaeology
interpretation
community
twentieth century
Excavation
Archaeology
Archaeological Record
Illinois
Field Methods
Archaeological Research
1960s
Salvage
Field Archaeology
time

Keywords

  • Archaeological History
  • Binford
  • CRM
  • Field Methods
  • Large-scale Excavations

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Archaeology
  • Archaeology

Cite this

Excavating communities : Lewis R. Binford and the interpretation of the archaeological record in Illinois. / Emerson, Thomas E; McElrath, Dale L.

In: Midcontinental Journal of Archaeology, Vol. 42, No. 3, 01.01.2017, p. 244-265.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{96b4a587a571440e9a8cac49965dc842,
title = "Excavating communities: Lewis R. Binford and the interpretation of the archaeological record in Illinois",
abstract = "Lewis Binford’s contributions to field archaeology have been largely ignored in favor of his many contributions to theoretical issues dominating the discipline of archaeology at the end of the twentieth century. We examine Binford’s excavation methods in southern Illinois in the early 1960s and demonstrate how his considered approach served to systematize large-scale site excavation procedures. He adopted the time-honored tool of the salvage archaeologist—heavy equipment—and unapologetically employed it in a fundamentally new way, proving it to be a tool that served the greater goals of archaeological research. We trace the development of field methods and theoretical approaches in two case studies of Illinois archaeology and demonstrate how Binford’s contributions have been incorporated or rejected by subsequent CRM researchers.",
keywords = "Archaeological History, Binford, CRM, Field Methods, Large-scale Excavations",
author = "Emerson, {Thomas E} and McElrath, {Dale L.}",
year = "2017",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1080/01461109.2017.1377453",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "42",
pages = "244--265",
journal = "Midcontinental journal of archaeology, MCJA",
issn = "0146-1109",
publisher = "Kent State University",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Excavating communities

T2 - Lewis R. Binford and the interpretation of the archaeological record in Illinois

AU - Emerson, Thomas E

AU - McElrath, Dale L.

PY - 2017/1/1

Y1 - 2017/1/1

N2 - Lewis Binford’s contributions to field archaeology have been largely ignored in favor of his many contributions to theoretical issues dominating the discipline of archaeology at the end of the twentieth century. We examine Binford’s excavation methods in southern Illinois in the early 1960s and demonstrate how his considered approach served to systematize large-scale site excavation procedures. He adopted the time-honored tool of the salvage archaeologist—heavy equipment—and unapologetically employed it in a fundamentally new way, proving it to be a tool that served the greater goals of archaeological research. We trace the development of field methods and theoretical approaches in two case studies of Illinois archaeology and demonstrate how Binford’s contributions have been incorporated or rejected by subsequent CRM researchers.

AB - Lewis Binford’s contributions to field archaeology have been largely ignored in favor of his many contributions to theoretical issues dominating the discipline of archaeology at the end of the twentieth century. We examine Binford’s excavation methods in southern Illinois in the early 1960s and demonstrate how his considered approach served to systematize large-scale site excavation procedures. He adopted the time-honored tool of the salvage archaeologist—heavy equipment—and unapologetically employed it in a fundamentally new way, proving it to be a tool that served the greater goals of archaeological research. We trace the development of field methods and theoretical approaches in two case studies of Illinois archaeology and demonstrate how Binford’s contributions have been incorporated or rejected by subsequent CRM researchers.

KW - Archaeological History

KW - Binford

KW - CRM

KW - Field Methods

KW - Large-scale Excavations

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85045885340&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85045885340&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/01461109.2017.1377453

DO - 10.1080/01461109.2017.1377453

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85045885340

VL - 42

SP - 244

EP - 265

JO - Midcontinental journal of archaeology, MCJA

JF - Midcontinental journal of archaeology, MCJA

SN - 0146-1109

IS - 3

ER -