Examining the validity and reliability of an abridged version of the perceived affect utility scale (PAUSe)

Philip I. Chow, Howard Berenbaum, Chun Wang

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

The present research presents evidence of the validity and reliability of an abbreviated version of the Perceived Affect Utility Scale (PAUSe). In Study 1, findings using item response theory (IRT) led to the deletion of one-third of the number of items in the PAUSe. Results from confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) supported the structure of the abbreviated version of the PAUSe, the PAUSe-r. Examining effect sizes between the PAUSe-r and instruments measuring personality, emotion, and depression also supported the convergent validity, discriminant validity, and incremental validity of this measure, even after taking into account ideal affect and the actual experience of emotion. In Study 2, test-retest reliability of the PAUSe-r in a sample of college students is presented. In Study 3, using data from a large, nonstudent sample, we replicated the structure of the PAUSe-r, as well as relations between the PAUSe-r and personality variables, that were found in Study 1.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)365-376
Number of pages12
JournalEuropean Journal of Psychological Assessment
Volume33
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 2017

Keywords

  • Affect
  • Emotion
  • Emotional utility
  • Perceived affect utility scale

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Applied Psychology

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Examining the validity and reliability of an abridged version of the perceived affect utility scale (PAUSe)'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this