Examining differential item functioning in self-reported health survey data: via multilevel modeling

Dandan Chen Kaptur, Yiqing Liu, Bradley Kaptur, Nicholas Peterman, Jinming Zhang, Justin L. Kern, Carolyn Anderson

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

Abstract

Few health-related constructs or measures have received a critical evaluation in terms of measurement equivalence, such as self-reported health survey data. Differential item functioning (DIF) analysis is crucial for evaluating measurement equivalence in self-reported health surveys, which are often hierarchical in structure. Traditional single-level DIF methods in this case fall short, making multilevel models a better alternative. We highlight the benefits of multilevel modeling for DIF analysis, when applying a health survey data set to multilevel binary logistic regression (for analyzing binary response data) and multilevel multinominal logistic regression (for analyzing polytomous response data), and comparing them with their single-level counterparts. Our findings show that multilevel models fit better and explain more variance than single-level models. This article is expected to raise awareness of multilevel modeling and help healthcare researchers and practitioners understand the use of multilevel modeling for DIF analysis.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number103870
Pages (from-to)1569-1577
Number of pages9
JournalQuality of Life Research
Volume34
Issue number6
Early online dateFeb 28 2025
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 2025

Keywords

  • Depression
  • Differential item functioning
  • Health disparity
  • Measurement equivalence
  • Multilevel modeling
  • Population density

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Examining differential item functioning in self-reported health survey data: via multilevel modeling'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this