Abstract
Few health-related constructs or measures have received a critical evaluation in terms of measurement equivalence, such as self-reported health survey data. Differential item functioning (DIF) analysis is crucial for evaluating measurement equivalence in self-reported health surveys, which are often hierarchical in structure. Traditional single-level DIF methods in this case fall short, making multilevel models a better alternative. We highlight the benefits of multilevel modeling for DIF analysis, when applying a health survey data set to multilevel binary logistic regression (for analyzing binary response data) and multilevel multinominal logistic regression (for analyzing polytomous response data), and comparing them with their single-level counterparts. Our findings show that multilevel models fit better and explain more variance than single-level models. This article is expected to raise awareness of multilevel modeling and help healthcare researchers and practitioners understand the use of multilevel modeling for DIF analysis.
Original language | English (US) |
---|---|
Article number | 103870 |
Pages (from-to) | 1569-1577 |
Number of pages | 9 |
Journal | Quality of Life Research |
Volume | 34 |
Issue number | 6 |
Early online date | Feb 28 2025 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - Jun 2025 |
Keywords
- Depression
- Differential item functioning
- Health disparity
- Measurement equivalence
- Multilevel modeling
- Population density
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health