Ex post liability for Harm vs. Ex Ante safety regulation: Substitutes or complements?

Charles D. Kolstad, Thomas S. Ulen, Gary V. Johnson

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Abstract

This paper concerns the regulation o f hazardous economic activities. Economists have generally viewed ex ante regulations (safety standards, Pigouvian fees) that regulate an activity before an accident occurs as substitutes for ex post policies (exposure to tort liability) for correcting externalities. This paper shows that where there is uncertaintyy there are inefficiencies associated with the exclusive use o f negligence liability and that ex ante regulation can correct the inefficiencies. In such a case it is efficient to set the safety standard below the level o f precaution that would be called for if the standard were used alone. (JEL 619).

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publicationThe Theory and Practice of Command and Control in Environmental Policy
EditorsPeter Berck, Gloria E Helfand
PublisherRoutledge
Pages331-346
Number of pages16
ISBN (Electronic)9781315197296
ISBN (Print)9781138715905
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 12 2018

Publication series

NameRoutledge Revivals

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • General Social Sciences

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Ex post liability for Harm vs. Ex Ante safety regulation: Substitutes or complements?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this