Evolution of thoracolumbar trauma classification systems: Assessing the conflict between mechanism and morphology of injury

Neel Anand, Alexander R. Vaccaro, Moe R. Lim, Joon Y. Lee, Paul Arnold, James S. Harrop, John Ratlif, Raja Rampersaud, Christopher M. Bono

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

Abstract

Spine specialists continue to debate how to best treat various types of thoracolumbar injuries. The first step in standardizing optimal treatment is for orthopedists, neurosurgeons, and rehabilitation specialists to arrive at a consensus regarding the classification of thoracolumbar fractures. Beginning with Böhler in 1931, there have been several attempts to forward thoracolumbar injury classifications systems since the advent of the radiograph. Throughout this period, surgeons and other health care providers have debated whether an effective injury classification system should be based upon the mechanism of injury or the morphology of injured tissues. A systematic review of the literature on thoracolumbar spine trauma classification systems, emphasizing contrasting features of mechanistic and morphometic paradigms, was conducted by 40 spine surgeons from 15 trauma centers in 10 countries. As a contemporary example of this debate, we also discuss 2 recently validated thoracolumbar-fracture classification systems developed by the Spine Trauma Study Group: one is predicated on injury mechanism (Thoracolumbar Injury Severity Score [TLISS]) and the other uses injury morphology (Thoracolumbar Injury Classification and Severity Score [TLICS]).

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)70-78
Number of pages9
JournalTopics in Spinal Cord Injury Rehabilitation
Volume12
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 1 2006
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Wounds and Injuries
Spine
Injury Severity Score
Trauma Centers
Health Personnel
Rehabilitation
Surgeons
Therapeutics

Keywords

  • Injury classification
  • Spine surgery
  • Spine trauma
  • TLICS
  • TLISS
  • Thoracolumbar injury

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation
  • Rehabilitation
  • Clinical Neurology

Cite this

Evolution of thoracolumbar trauma classification systems : Assessing the conflict between mechanism and morphology of injury. / Anand, Neel; Vaccaro, Alexander R.; Lim, Moe R.; Lee, Joon Y.; Arnold, Paul; Harrop, James S.; Ratlif, John; Rampersaud, Raja; Bono, Christopher M.

In: Topics in Spinal Cord Injury Rehabilitation, Vol. 12, No. 1, 01.06.2006, p. 70-78.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

Anand, Neel ; Vaccaro, Alexander R. ; Lim, Moe R. ; Lee, Joon Y. ; Arnold, Paul ; Harrop, James S. ; Ratlif, John ; Rampersaud, Raja ; Bono, Christopher M. / Evolution of thoracolumbar trauma classification systems : Assessing the conflict between mechanism and morphology of injury. In: Topics in Spinal Cord Injury Rehabilitation. 2006 ; Vol. 12, No. 1. pp. 70-78.
@article{bc324f7e30a440a684ad2cdc09da16c1,
title = "Evolution of thoracolumbar trauma classification systems: Assessing the conflict between mechanism and morphology of injury",
abstract = "Spine specialists continue to debate how to best treat various types of thoracolumbar injuries. The first step in standardizing optimal treatment is for orthopedists, neurosurgeons, and rehabilitation specialists to arrive at a consensus regarding the classification of thoracolumbar fractures. Beginning with B{\"o}hler in 1931, there have been several attempts to forward thoracolumbar injury classifications systems since the advent of the radiograph. Throughout this period, surgeons and other health care providers have debated whether an effective injury classification system should be based upon the mechanism of injury or the morphology of injured tissues. A systematic review of the literature on thoracolumbar spine trauma classification systems, emphasizing contrasting features of mechanistic and morphometic paradigms, was conducted by 40 spine surgeons from 15 trauma centers in 10 countries. As a contemporary example of this debate, we also discuss 2 recently validated thoracolumbar-fracture classification systems developed by the Spine Trauma Study Group: one is predicated on injury mechanism (Thoracolumbar Injury Severity Score [TLISS]) and the other uses injury morphology (Thoracolumbar Injury Classification and Severity Score [TLICS]).",
keywords = "Injury classification, Spine surgery, Spine trauma, TLICS, TLISS, Thoracolumbar injury",
author = "Neel Anand and Vaccaro, {Alexander R.} and Lim, {Moe R.} and Lee, {Joon Y.} and Paul Arnold and Harrop, {James S.} and John Ratlif and Raja Rampersaud and Bono, {Christopher M.}",
year = "2006",
month = "6",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1310/FW11-BWYK-YXU7-C5N3",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "12",
pages = "70--78",
journal = "Topics in Spinal Cord Injury Rehabilitation",
issn = "1082-0744",
publisher = "Thomas Land Publishers Inc.",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Evolution of thoracolumbar trauma classification systems

T2 - Assessing the conflict between mechanism and morphology of injury

AU - Anand, Neel

AU - Vaccaro, Alexander R.

AU - Lim, Moe R.

AU - Lee, Joon Y.

AU - Arnold, Paul

AU - Harrop, James S.

AU - Ratlif, John

AU - Rampersaud, Raja

AU - Bono, Christopher M.

PY - 2006/6/1

Y1 - 2006/6/1

N2 - Spine specialists continue to debate how to best treat various types of thoracolumbar injuries. The first step in standardizing optimal treatment is for orthopedists, neurosurgeons, and rehabilitation specialists to arrive at a consensus regarding the classification of thoracolumbar fractures. Beginning with Böhler in 1931, there have been several attempts to forward thoracolumbar injury classifications systems since the advent of the radiograph. Throughout this period, surgeons and other health care providers have debated whether an effective injury classification system should be based upon the mechanism of injury or the morphology of injured tissues. A systematic review of the literature on thoracolumbar spine trauma classification systems, emphasizing contrasting features of mechanistic and morphometic paradigms, was conducted by 40 spine surgeons from 15 trauma centers in 10 countries. As a contemporary example of this debate, we also discuss 2 recently validated thoracolumbar-fracture classification systems developed by the Spine Trauma Study Group: one is predicated on injury mechanism (Thoracolumbar Injury Severity Score [TLISS]) and the other uses injury morphology (Thoracolumbar Injury Classification and Severity Score [TLICS]).

AB - Spine specialists continue to debate how to best treat various types of thoracolumbar injuries. The first step in standardizing optimal treatment is for orthopedists, neurosurgeons, and rehabilitation specialists to arrive at a consensus regarding the classification of thoracolumbar fractures. Beginning with Böhler in 1931, there have been several attempts to forward thoracolumbar injury classifications systems since the advent of the radiograph. Throughout this period, surgeons and other health care providers have debated whether an effective injury classification system should be based upon the mechanism of injury or the morphology of injured tissues. A systematic review of the literature on thoracolumbar spine trauma classification systems, emphasizing contrasting features of mechanistic and morphometic paradigms, was conducted by 40 spine surgeons from 15 trauma centers in 10 countries. As a contemporary example of this debate, we also discuss 2 recently validated thoracolumbar-fracture classification systems developed by the Spine Trauma Study Group: one is predicated on injury mechanism (Thoracolumbar Injury Severity Score [TLISS]) and the other uses injury morphology (Thoracolumbar Injury Classification and Severity Score [TLICS]).

KW - Injury classification

KW - Spine surgery

KW - Spine trauma

KW - TLICS

KW - TLISS

KW - Thoracolumbar injury

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33745296479&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33745296479&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1310/FW11-BWYK-YXU7-C5N3

DO - 10.1310/FW11-BWYK-YXU7-C5N3

M3 - Review article

AN - SCOPUS:33745296479

VL - 12

SP - 70

EP - 78

JO - Topics in Spinal Cord Injury Rehabilitation

JF - Topics in Spinal Cord Injury Rehabilitation

SN - 1082-0744

IS - 1

ER -