TY - GEN
T1 - Evolution of protein architectures inferred from phylogenomic analysis of CATH
AU - Bukhari, S. A.
AU - Caetano-Anollés, G.
PY - 2011
Y1 - 2011
N2 - Protein architecture refers to similar secondary structural arrangements irrespective of their connectivity. Here we aim to explore the evolution of protein architectures by benchmarking CATH and SCOP annotations. For example, we explore the appearance and diversification of protein architectures such as sandwiches, bundles, barrels, solenoids, ribbons, trefoils, prisms and propellers. Structural phylogenies generated at CATH "A", "T" and "H" levels of structural abstraction revealed patterns of reductive evolution and three epochs in the evolution of protein world. Although CATH and SCOP differ significantly in their protein domain definitions and in the hierarchical partitioning of fold space, our findings strongly support the fact that both protein structural classification systems classify a protein on a very similar theoretical basis by taking into account their structural, functional and evolutionary roles. The tree of "A" showed that the 3-layer (aba) sandwich (3.40), the orthogonal bundle (1.10) and the alpha-beta complex (3.90) harbor simple secondary structure arrangements that are the most ancient, popular and abundant architectures in the protein world.
AB - Protein architecture refers to similar secondary structural arrangements irrespective of their connectivity. Here we aim to explore the evolution of protein architectures by benchmarking CATH and SCOP annotations. For example, we explore the appearance and diversification of protein architectures such as sandwiches, bundles, barrels, solenoids, ribbons, trefoils, prisms and propellers. Structural phylogenies generated at CATH "A", "T" and "H" levels of structural abstraction revealed patterns of reductive evolution and three epochs in the evolution of protein world. Although CATH and SCOP differ significantly in their protein domain definitions and in the hierarchical partitioning of fold space, our findings strongly support the fact that both protein structural classification systems classify a protein on a very similar theoretical basis by taking into account their structural, functional and evolutionary roles. The tree of "A" showed that the 3-layer (aba) sandwich (3.40), the orthogonal bundle (1.10) and the alpha-beta complex (3.90) harbor simple secondary structure arrangements that are the most ancient, popular and abundant architectures in the protein world.
KW - Last Universal Common Ancestor
KW - Tree of Architectures
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84855988033&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84855988033&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1109/BIBMW.2011.6112548
DO - 10.1109/BIBMW.2011.6112548
M3 - Conference contribution
AN - SCOPUS:84855988033
SN - 9781457716133
T3 - 2011 IEEE International Conference on Bioinformatics and Biomedicine Workshops, BIBMW 2011
SP - 1029
EP - 1031
BT - 2011 IEEE International Conference on Bioinformatics and Biomedicine Workshops, BIBMW 2011
T2 - 2011 IEEE International Conference onBioinformatics and Biomedicine Workshops, BIBMW 2011
Y2 - 12 November 2011 through 15 November 2011
ER -