Evidence of Location Memory in 8-Month-Old Infants in a Nonsearch AB Task

Renee L Baillargeon, Marcia Graber

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Recent studies have shown that when an object is hidden in a location A and then in a location B, 8-month-old infants tend to search in A if forced to wait 3 s before retrieving the object, and to search randomly in A or B if forced to wait 6 s before retrieving the object (e.g., Diamond, 1985). A non-search method was devised to examine 8-month-olds' ability to remember the location of a hidden object. The infants saw an object standing on one of two placemats located on either side of the midline. Next, screens were pushed in front of the placemats, hiding the object from view. After 15 s, a hand reached behind one of the screens and reappeared holding the object. The infants looked reliably longer when the hand retrieved the object from behind the "wrong" as opposed to the "right" screen (where the object was actually hidden). This result suggests that the infants (a) remembered the object's location during the 15-s delay and (b) were surprised to see the object retrieved from behind the right (left) screen when they had last seen it on the left (right) placemat. These results indicate that 8-month-old infants' ability to remember the location of a hidden object is far better than their performance in the AB search task suggests. As such, the present results cast serious doubts on accounts that attribute infants' perseverative and/or random search errors to limited memory mechanisms.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)502-511
Number of pages10
JournalDevelopmental psychology
Volume24
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 1988

Fingerprint

infant
evidence
Aptitude
Hand
Diamond
ability

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Demography
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology
  • Life-span and Life-course Studies

Cite this

Evidence of Location Memory in 8-Month-Old Infants in a Nonsearch AB Task. / Baillargeon, Renee L; Graber, Marcia.

In: Developmental psychology, Vol. 24, No. 4, 07.1988, p. 502-511.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{1915af7d0c1b440283d7593f5f55567a,
title = "Evidence of Location Memory in 8-Month-Old Infants in a Nonsearch AB Task",
abstract = "Recent studies have shown that when an object is hidden in a location A and then in a location B, 8-month-old infants tend to search in A if forced to wait 3 s before retrieving the object, and to search randomly in A or B if forced to wait 6 s before retrieving the object (e.g., Diamond, 1985). A non-search method was devised to examine 8-month-olds' ability to remember the location of a hidden object. The infants saw an object standing on one of two placemats located on either side of the midline. Next, screens were pushed in front of the placemats, hiding the object from view. After 15 s, a hand reached behind one of the screens and reappeared holding the object. The infants looked reliably longer when the hand retrieved the object from behind the {"}wrong{"} as opposed to the {"}right{"} screen (where the object was actually hidden). This result suggests that the infants (a) remembered the object's location during the 15-s delay and (b) were surprised to see the object retrieved from behind the right (left) screen when they had last seen it on the left (right) placemat. These results indicate that 8-month-old infants' ability to remember the location of a hidden object is far better than their performance in the AB search task suggests. As such, the present results cast serious doubts on accounts that attribute infants' perseverative and/or random search errors to limited memory mechanisms.",
author = "Baillargeon, {Renee L} and Marcia Graber",
year = "1988",
month = "7",
doi = "10.1037/0012-1649.24.4.502",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "24",
pages = "502--511",
journal = "Developmental Psychology",
issn = "0012-1649",
publisher = "American Psychological Association Inc.",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Evidence of Location Memory in 8-Month-Old Infants in a Nonsearch AB Task

AU - Baillargeon, Renee L

AU - Graber, Marcia

PY - 1988/7

Y1 - 1988/7

N2 - Recent studies have shown that when an object is hidden in a location A and then in a location B, 8-month-old infants tend to search in A if forced to wait 3 s before retrieving the object, and to search randomly in A or B if forced to wait 6 s before retrieving the object (e.g., Diamond, 1985). A non-search method was devised to examine 8-month-olds' ability to remember the location of a hidden object. The infants saw an object standing on one of two placemats located on either side of the midline. Next, screens were pushed in front of the placemats, hiding the object from view. After 15 s, a hand reached behind one of the screens and reappeared holding the object. The infants looked reliably longer when the hand retrieved the object from behind the "wrong" as opposed to the "right" screen (where the object was actually hidden). This result suggests that the infants (a) remembered the object's location during the 15-s delay and (b) were surprised to see the object retrieved from behind the right (left) screen when they had last seen it on the left (right) placemat. These results indicate that 8-month-old infants' ability to remember the location of a hidden object is far better than their performance in the AB search task suggests. As such, the present results cast serious doubts on accounts that attribute infants' perseverative and/or random search errors to limited memory mechanisms.

AB - Recent studies have shown that when an object is hidden in a location A and then in a location B, 8-month-old infants tend to search in A if forced to wait 3 s before retrieving the object, and to search randomly in A or B if forced to wait 6 s before retrieving the object (e.g., Diamond, 1985). A non-search method was devised to examine 8-month-olds' ability to remember the location of a hidden object. The infants saw an object standing on one of two placemats located on either side of the midline. Next, screens were pushed in front of the placemats, hiding the object from view. After 15 s, a hand reached behind one of the screens and reappeared holding the object. The infants looked reliably longer when the hand retrieved the object from behind the "wrong" as opposed to the "right" screen (where the object was actually hidden). This result suggests that the infants (a) remembered the object's location during the 15-s delay and (b) were surprised to see the object retrieved from behind the right (left) screen when they had last seen it on the left (right) placemat. These results indicate that 8-month-old infants' ability to remember the location of a hidden object is far better than their performance in the AB search task suggests. As such, the present results cast serious doubts on accounts that attribute infants' perseverative and/or random search errors to limited memory mechanisms.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0000208888&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0000208888&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1037/0012-1649.24.4.502

DO - 10.1037/0012-1649.24.4.502

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:0000208888

VL - 24

SP - 502

EP - 511

JO - Developmental Psychology

JF - Developmental Psychology

SN - 0012-1649

IS - 4

ER -