Evaluation of low cost cathode materials for treatment of industrial and food processing wastewater using microbial electrolysis cells

Alberto Tenca, Roland D. Cusick, Andrea Schievano, Roberto Oberti, Bruce E. Logan

Research output: Research - peer-reviewArticle

Abstract

Microbial electrolysis cells (MECs) can be used to treat wastewater and produce hydrogen gas, but low cost cathode catalysts are needed to make this approach economical. Molybdenum disulfide (MoS2) and stainless steel (SS) were evaluated as alternative cathode catalysts to platinum (Pt) in terms of treatment efficiency and energy recovery using actual wastewaters. Two different types of wastewaters were examined, a methanol-rich industrial (IN) wastewater and a food processing (FP) wastewater. The use of the MoS2 catalyst generally resulted in better performance than the SS cathodes for both wastewaters, although the use of the Pt catalyst provided the best performance in terms of biogas production, current density, and TCOD removal. Overall, the wastewater composition was more of a factor than catalyst type for accomplishing overall treatment. The IN wastewater had higher biogas production rates (0.8-1.8 m3/m3-d), and COD removal rates (1.8-2.8 kg-COD/m3-d) than the FP wastewater. The overall energy recoveries were positive for the IN wastewater (3.1-3.8 kWh/kg-COD removed), while the FP wastewater required a net energy input of -0.7 - 1.2 kWh/kg-COD using MoS 2 or Pt cathodes, and -3.1 kWh/kg-COD with SS. These results suggest that MoS2 is the most suitable alternative to Pt as a cathode catalyst for wastewater treatment using MECs, but that net energy recovery will be highly dependent on the specific wastewater.

LanguageEnglish (US)
Pages1859-1865
Number of pages7
JournalInternational Journal of Hydrogen Energy
Volume38
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 12 2013

Fingerprint

food processing
electrolysis
cathodes
catalysts
evaluation
cells
Food processing
crack opening displacement
platinum
energy
stainless steels
recovery
Catalysts
Stainless steel
molybdenum disulfides
methyl alcohol
current density
hydrogen
gases
Methanol

Keywords

  • Energy recovery
  • MEC
  • Methanol
  • Molybdenum disulfide
  • Wastewater

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment
  • Fuel Technology
  • Condensed Matter Physics
  • Energy Engineering and Power Technology

Cite this

Evaluation of low cost cathode materials for treatment of industrial and food processing wastewater using microbial electrolysis cells. / Tenca, Alberto; Cusick, Roland D.; Schievano, Andrea; Oberti, Roberto; Logan, Bruce E.

In: International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, Vol. 38, No. 4, 12.02.2013, p. 1859-1865.

Research output: Research - peer-reviewArticle

@article{3afa79e426a34f2c8f095ed17096f9da,
title = "Evaluation of low cost cathode materials for treatment of industrial and food processing wastewater using microbial electrolysis cells",
abstract = "Microbial electrolysis cells (MECs) can be used to treat wastewater and produce hydrogen gas, but low cost cathode catalysts are needed to make this approach economical. Molybdenum disulfide (MoS2) and stainless steel (SS) were evaluated as alternative cathode catalysts to platinum (Pt) in terms of treatment efficiency and energy recovery using actual wastewaters. Two different types of wastewaters were examined, a methanol-rich industrial (IN) wastewater and a food processing (FP) wastewater. The use of the MoS2 catalyst generally resulted in better performance than the SS cathodes for both wastewaters, although the use of the Pt catalyst provided the best performance in terms of biogas production, current density, and TCOD removal. Overall, the wastewater composition was more of a factor than catalyst type for accomplishing overall treatment. The IN wastewater had higher biogas production rates (0.8-1.8 m3/m3-d), and COD removal rates (1.8-2.8 kg-COD/m3-d) than the FP wastewater. The overall energy recoveries were positive for the IN wastewater (3.1-3.8 kWh/kg-COD removed), while the FP wastewater required a net energy input of -0.7 - 1.2 kWh/kg-COD using MoS 2 or Pt cathodes, and -3.1 kWh/kg-COD with SS. These results suggest that MoS2 is the most suitable alternative to Pt as a cathode catalyst for wastewater treatment using MECs, but that net energy recovery will be highly dependent on the specific wastewater.",
keywords = "Energy recovery, MEC, Methanol, Molybdenum disulfide, Wastewater",
author = "Alberto Tenca and Cusick, {Roland D.} and Andrea Schievano and Roberto Oberti and Logan, {Bruce E.}",
year = "2013",
month = "2",
doi = "10.1016/j.ijhydene.2012.11.103",
volume = "38",
pages = "1859--1865",
journal = "International Journal of Hydrogen Energy",
issn = "0360-3199",
publisher = "Elsevier Limited",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Evaluation of low cost cathode materials for treatment of industrial and food processing wastewater using microbial electrolysis cells

AU - Tenca,Alberto

AU - Cusick,Roland D.

AU - Schievano,Andrea

AU - Oberti,Roberto

AU - Logan,Bruce E.

PY - 2013/2/12

Y1 - 2013/2/12

N2 - Microbial electrolysis cells (MECs) can be used to treat wastewater and produce hydrogen gas, but low cost cathode catalysts are needed to make this approach economical. Molybdenum disulfide (MoS2) and stainless steel (SS) were evaluated as alternative cathode catalysts to platinum (Pt) in terms of treatment efficiency and energy recovery using actual wastewaters. Two different types of wastewaters were examined, a methanol-rich industrial (IN) wastewater and a food processing (FP) wastewater. The use of the MoS2 catalyst generally resulted in better performance than the SS cathodes for both wastewaters, although the use of the Pt catalyst provided the best performance in terms of biogas production, current density, and TCOD removal. Overall, the wastewater composition was more of a factor than catalyst type for accomplishing overall treatment. The IN wastewater had higher biogas production rates (0.8-1.8 m3/m3-d), and COD removal rates (1.8-2.8 kg-COD/m3-d) than the FP wastewater. The overall energy recoveries were positive for the IN wastewater (3.1-3.8 kWh/kg-COD removed), while the FP wastewater required a net energy input of -0.7 - 1.2 kWh/kg-COD using MoS 2 or Pt cathodes, and -3.1 kWh/kg-COD with SS. These results suggest that MoS2 is the most suitable alternative to Pt as a cathode catalyst for wastewater treatment using MECs, but that net energy recovery will be highly dependent on the specific wastewater.

AB - Microbial electrolysis cells (MECs) can be used to treat wastewater and produce hydrogen gas, but low cost cathode catalysts are needed to make this approach economical. Molybdenum disulfide (MoS2) and stainless steel (SS) were evaluated as alternative cathode catalysts to platinum (Pt) in terms of treatment efficiency and energy recovery using actual wastewaters. Two different types of wastewaters were examined, a methanol-rich industrial (IN) wastewater and a food processing (FP) wastewater. The use of the MoS2 catalyst generally resulted in better performance than the SS cathodes for both wastewaters, although the use of the Pt catalyst provided the best performance in terms of biogas production, current density, and TCOD removal. Overall, the wastewater composition was more of a factor than catalyst type for accomplishing overall treatment. The IN wastewater had higher biogas production rates (0.8-1.8 m3/m3-d), and COD removal rates (1.8-2.8 kg-COD/m3-d) than the FP wastewater. The overall energy recoveries were positive for the IN wastewater (3.1-3.8 kWh/kg-COD removed), while the FP wastewater required a net energy input of -0.7 - 1.2 kWh/kg-COD using MoS 2 or Pt cathodes, and -3.1 kWh/kg-COD with SS. These results suggest that MoS2 is the most suitable alternative to Pt as a cathode catalyst for wastewater treatment using MECs, but that net energy recovery will be highly dependent on the specific wastewater.

KW - Energy recovery

KW - MEC

KW - Methanol

KW - Molybdenum disulfide

KW - Wastewater

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84872613454&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84872613454&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2012.11.103

DO - 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2012.11.103

M3 - Article

VL - 38

SP - 1859

EP - 1865

JO - International Journal of Hydrogen Energy

T2 - International Journal of Hydrogen Energy

JF - International Journal of Hydrogen Energy

SN - 0360-3199

IS - 4

ER -