Evaluation of Integrated Waterbird Management and Monitoring Program Survey Techniques to Assess Waterbird Abundance

Heath Hagy, Brian Loges, Aaron Yetter, Andrew Gilbert

Research output: Contribution to conferencePaper

Abstract

A wide variety of survey designs and protocols are used to monitor waterfowl and other wetland-dependent bird (collectively, waterbird) abundance during migration and winter (hereafter, non-breeding period). Biologists from state and federal agencies, non-government conservation organizations, and universities use waterbird monitoring data to track trends in site use over time, index local population sizes, provide outreach to the general public, evaluate management or conservation actions, and myriad other purposes. However, inconsistent methodologies and inadequate design relative to survey objectives or science needs often reduce the usefulness of waterbird monitoring data. The Integrated Waterbird Management and Monitoring Program (IWMM) represents a collaboration between many partners to provide a framework for standardized data collection, data management, and manipulation of decision support tools through an interactive online portal to assist habitat managers and decision makers in non-breeding habitat conservation and delivery. We evaluated the IWMM waterbird monitoring protocol by comparing seasonal duck use-day estimates and peak abundances derived from ground surveys to estimates based on aerial surveys during 2010­–2016 at portions of Clarence Cannon, Great River, and Two Rivers National Wildlife Refuges. Aerial surveys were conducted by the Illinois Natural History Survey and corrected for detection probability and count bias using results from an ongoing research project. Ground surveys were conducted during the same week as aerial surveys by the Fish and Wildlife Service or cooperators. We will present results from this evaluation, model factors (e.g., observer, vegetation cover, weather conditions) affecting waterbird surveys, and make recommendations for future implementation of the IWMM survey protocol.
Original languageEnglish (US)
StatePublished - 2018
Event2018 Midwest Fish and Wildlife Conference - Milwaukee, United States
Duration: Jan 28 2018Jan 31 2018
Conference number: 78

Conference

Conference2018 Midwest Fish and Wildlife Conference
CountryUnited States
CityMilwaukee
Period1/28/181/31/18

Fingerprint

aerial survey
monitoring
habitat conservation
survey design
waterfowl
data management
river
refuge
vegetation cover
integrated management
evaluation
programme
population size
wetland
bird
methodology
winter
habitat
fish
history

Keywords

  • INHS

Cite this

Hagy, H., Loges, B., Yetter, A., & Gilbert, A. (2018). Evaluation of Integrated Waterbird Management and Monitoring Program Survey Techniques to Assess Waterbird Abundance. Paper presented at 2018 Midwest Fish and Wildlife Conference, Milwaukee, United States.

Evaluation of Integrated Waterbird Management and Monitoring Program Survey Techniques to Assess Waterbird Abundance. / Hagy, Heath; Loges, Brian; Yetter, Aaron; Gilbert, Andrew.

2018. Paper presented at 2018 Midwest Fish and Wildlife Conference, Milwaukee, United States.

Research output: Contribution to conferencePaper

Hagy, H, Loges, B, Yetter, A & Gilbert, A 2018, 'Evaluation of Integrated Waterbird Management and Monitoring Program Survey Techniques to Assess Waterbird Abundance' Paper presented at 2018 Midwest Fish and Wildlife Conference, Milwaukee, United States, 1/28/18 - 1/31/18, .
Hagy H, Loges B, Yetter A, Gilbert A. Evaluation of Integrated Waterbird Management and Monitoring Program Survey Techniques to Assess Waterbird Abundance. 2018. Paper presented at 2018 Midwest Fish and Wildlife Conference, Milwaukee, United States.
Hagy, Heath ; Loges, Brian ; Yetter, Aaron ; Gilbert, Andrew. / Evaluation of Integrated Waterbird Management and Monitoring Program Survey Techniques to Assess Waterbird Abundance. Paper presented at 2018 Midwest Fish and Wildlife Conference, Milwaukee, United States.
@conference{f6f7b1d72cf34769ae1137b53a08d45e,
title = "Evaluation of Integrated Waterbird Management and Monitoring Program Survey Techniques to Assess Waterbird Abundance",
abstract = "A wide variety of survey designs and protocols are used to monitor waterfowl and other wetland-dependent bird (collectively, waterbird) abundance during migration and winter (hereafter, non-breeding period). Biologists from state and federal agencies, non-government conservation organizations, and universities use waterbird monitoring data to track trends in site use over time, index local population sizes, provide outreach to the general public, evaluate management or conservation actions, and myriad other purposes. However, inconsistent methodologies and inadequate design relative to survey objectives or science needs often reduce the usefulness of waterbird monitoring data. The Integrated Waterbird Management and Monitoring Program (IWMM) represents a collaboration between many partners to provide a framework for standardized data collection, data management, and manipulation of decision support tools through an interactive online portal to assist habitat managers and decision makers in non-breeding habitat conservation and delivery. We evaluated the IWMM waterbird monitoring protocol by comparing seasonal duck use-day estimates and peak abundances derived from ground surveys to estimates based on aerial surveys during 2010­–2016 at portions of Clarence Cannon, Great River, and Two Rivers National Wildlife Refuges. Aerial surveys were conducted by the Illinois Natural History Survey and corrected for detection probability and count bias using results from an ongoing research project. Ground surveys were conducted during the same week as aerial surveys by the Fish and Wildlife Service or cooperators. We will present results from this evaluation, model factors (e.g., observer, vegetation cover, weather conditions) affecting waterbird surveys, and make recommendations for future implementation of the IWMM survey protocol.",
keywords = "INHS",
author = "Heath Hagy and Brian Loges and Aaron Yetter and Andrew Gilbert",
year = "2018",
language = "English (US)",
note = "2018 Midwest Fish and Wildlife Conference ; Conference date: 28-01-2018 Through 31-01-2018",

}

TY - CONF

T1 - Evaluation of Integrated Waterbird Management and Monitoring Program Survey Techniques to Assess Waterbird Abundance

AU - Hagy, Heath

AU - Loges, Brian

AU - Yetter, Aaron

AU - Gilbert, Andrew

PY - 2018

Y1 - 2018

N2 - A wide variety of survey designs and protocols are used to monitor waterfowl and other wetland-dependent bird (collectively, waterbird) abundance during migration and winter (hereafter, non-breeding period). Biologists from state and federal agencies, non-government conservation organizations, and universities use waterbird monitoring data to track trends in site use over time, index local population sizes, provide outreach to the general public, evaluate management or conservation actions, and myriad other purposes. However, inconsistent methodologies and inadequate design relative to survey objectives or science needs often reduce the usefulness of waterbird monitoring data. The Integrated Waterbird Management and Monitoring Program (IWMM) represents a collaboration between many partners to provide a framework for standardized data collection, data management, and manipulation of decision support tools through an interactive online portal to assist habitat managers and decision makers in non-breeding habitat conservation and delivery. We evaluated the IWMM waterbird monitoring protocol by comparing seasonal duck use-day estimates and peak abundances derived from ground surveys to estimates based on aerial surveys during 2010­–2016 at portions of Clarence Cannon, Great River, and Two Rivers National Wildlife Refuges. Aerial surveys were conducted by the Illinois Natural History Survey and corrected for detection probability and count bias using results from an ongoing research project. Ground surveys were conducted during the same week as aerial surveys by the Fish and Wildlife Service or cooperators. We will present results from this evaluation, model factors (e.g., observer, vegetation cover, weather conditions) affecting waterbird surveys, and make recommendations for future implementation of the IWMM survey protocol.

AB - A wide variety of survey designs and protocols are used to monitor waterfowl and other wetland-dependent bird (collectively, waterbird) abundance during migration and winter (hereafter, non-breeding period). Biologists from state and federal agencies, non-government conservation organizations, and universities use waterbird monitoring data to track trends in site use over time, index local population sizes, provide outreach to the general public, evaluate management or conservation actions, and myriad other purposes. However, inconsistent methodologies and inadequate design relative to survey objectives or science needs often reduce the usefulness of waterbird monitoring data. The Integrated Waterbird Management and Monitoring Program (IWMM) represents a collaboration between many partners to provide a framework for standardized data collection, data management, and manipulation of decision support tools through an interactive online portal to assist habitat managers and decision makers in non-breeding habitat conservation and delivery. We evaluated the IWMM waterbird monitoring protocol by comparing seasonal duck use-day estimates and peak abundances derived from ground surveys to estimates based on aerial surveys during 2010­–2016 at portions of Clarence Cannon, Great River, and Two Rivers National Wildlife Refuges. Aerial surveys were conducted by the Illinois Natural History Survey and corrected for detection probability and count bias using results from an ongoing research project. Ground surveys were conducted during the same week as aerial surveys by the Fish and Wildlife Service or cooperators. We will present results from this evaluation, model factors (e.g., observer, vegetation cover, weather conditions) affecting waterbird surveys, and make recommendations for future implementation of the IWMM survey protocol.

KW - INHS

M3 - Paper

ER -