Abstract

Neuropeptide identification in mass spectrometry experiments using database search programs developed for proteins is challenging. Unlike proteins, the detection of the complete sequence using a single spectrum is required to identify neuropeptides or prohormone peptides. This study compared the performance of three open-source programs used to identify proteins, OMSSA, X!Tandem and Crux, to identify prohormone peptides. From a target database of 7850 prohormone peptides, 23550 query spectra were simulated across different scenarios. Crux was the only program that correctly matched all peptides regardless of p-value and at p-value < 1 × 10-2, 33%, 64%, and >75%, of the 5, 6, and ≥7 amino acid-peptides were detected. Crux also had the best performance in the identification of peptides from chimera spectra and in a variety of missing ion scenarios. OMSSA, X!Tandem and Crux correctly detected 98.9% (99.9%), 93.9% (97.4%) and 88.7% (98.3%) of the peptides at E- or p-value < 1 × 10-6 (< 1 × 10-2), respectively. OMSSA and X!Tandem outperformed the other programs in significance level and computational speed, respectively. A consensus approach is not recommended because some prohormone peptides were only identified by one program.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)6044-6055
Number of pages12
JournalJournal of Proteome Research
Volume11
Issue number12
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 7 2012

Keywords

  • Crux
  • database search program
  • OMSSA
  • peptidomics
  • prohormones
  • X!Tandem

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Biochemistry
  • Chemistry(all)

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Evaluation of database search programs for accurate detection of neuropeptides in tandem mass spectrometry experiments'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this