TY - JOUR
T1 - Evaluation of database search programs for accurate detection of neuropeptides in tandem mass spectrometry experiments
AU - Akhtar, Malik N.
AU - Southey, Bruce R.
AU - Andrén, Per E.
AU - Sweedler, Jonathan V.
AU - Rodriguez-Zas, Sandra L.
PY - 2012/12/7
Y1 - 2012/12/7
N2 - Neuropeptide identification in mass spectrometry experiments using database search programs developed for proteins is challenging. Unlike proteins, the detection of the complete sequence using a single spectrum is required to identify neuropeptides or prohormone peptides. This study compared the performance of three open-source programs used to identify proteins, OMSSA, X!Tandem and Crux, to identify prohormone peptides. From a target database of 7850 prohormone peptides, 23550 query spectra were simulated across different scenarios. Crux was the only program that correctly matched all peptides regardless of p-value and at p-value < 1 × 10-2, 33%, 64%, and >75%, of the 5, 6, and ≥7 amino acid-peptides were detected. Crux also had the best performance in the identification of peptides from chimera spectra and in a variety of missing ion scenarios. OMSSA, X!Tandem and Crux correctly detected 98.9% (99.9%), 93.9% (97.4%) and 88.7% (98.3%) of the peptides at E- or p-value < 1 × 10-6 (< 1 × 10-2), respectively. OMSSA and X!Tandem outperformed the other programs in significance level and computational speed, respectively. A consensus approach is not recommended because some prohormone peptides were only identified by one program.
AB - Neuropeptide identification in mass spectrometry experiments using database search programs developed for proteins is challenging. Unlike proteins, the detection of the complete sequence using a single spectrum is required to identify neuropeptides or prohormone peptides. This study compared the performance of three open-source programs used to identify proteins, OMSSA, X!Tandem and Crux, to identify prohormone peptides. From a target database of 7850 prohormone peptides, 23550 query spectra were simulated across different scenarios. Crux was the only program that correctly matched all peptides regardless of p-value and at p-value < 1 × 10-2, 33%, 64%, and >75%, of the 5, 6, and ≥7 amino acid-peptides were detected. Crux also had the best performance in the identification of peptides from chimera spectra and in a variety of missing ion scenarios. OMSSA, X!Tandem and Crux correctly detected 98.9% (99.9%), 93.9% (97.4%) and 88.7% (98.3%) of the peptides at E- or p-value < 1 × 10-6 (< 1 × 10-2), respectively. OMSSA and X!Tandem outperformed the other programs in significance level and computational speed, respectively. A consensus approach is not recommended because some prohormone peptides were only identified by one program.
KW - Crux
KW - database search program
KW - OMSSA
KW - peptidomics
KW - prohormones
KW - X!Tandem
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84870925388&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84870925388&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1021/pr3007123
DO - 10.1021/pr3007123
M3 - Article
C2 - 23082934
AN - SCOPUS:84870925388
SN - 1535-3893
VL - 11
SP - 6044
EP - 6055
JO - Journal of Proteome Research
JF - Journal of Proteome Research
IS - 12
ER -