TY - JOUR
T1 - Evaluation of Commercially Available Infant-feeding Mobile Applications Using App Quality Evaluation Tool
AU - MacMillan Uribe, Alexandra L.
AU - DiFilippo, Kristen N.
AU - Jarnell, Kelsey
AU - Patterson, Julie A.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2023 Society for Nutrition Education and Behavior
PY - 2023/8
Y1 - 2023/8
N2 - Objective: Assess the quality of free, commercially available infant-feeding mobile applications (apps) and their appropriateness for audiences with low income and of racial and ethnic diversity using the App Quality Evaluation tool. Methods: Researchers selected apps using an iterative process (n = 6). Health professionals (n = 10) who work with mothers with infants and low income who completed the App Quality Evaluation tool for each app, consisting of 7 domains of app quality. Average domain scores were calculated for each app (> 8 indicates high quality). Results: Evaluators highly rated app function and purpose for WebMD Baby (8.0 ± 1.8 and 8.2 ± 0.9, respectively) and Baby Center (8.0 ± 2.1 and 8.0 ± 2.6, respectively). For other apps, no domains were highly rated. No apps were rated highly for appropriateness (range 5.7–7.7) nor provided high-quality infant-feeding information for mothers with low income. Few apps were rated highly appropriate for mothers who are Black or Hispanic. Conclusions and Implications: Commercially available infant-feeding apps are of limited quality, indicating the need to develop high-quality apps for audiences with low income and Black and Hispanic identities.
AB - Objective: Assess the quality of free, commercially available infant-feeding mobile applications (apps) and their appropriateness for audiences with low income and of racial and ethnic diversity using the App Quality Evaluation tool. Methods: Researchers selected apps using an iterative process (n = 6). Health professionals (n = 10) who work with mothers with infants and low income who completed the App Quality Evaluation tool for each app, consisting of 7 domains of app quality. Average domain scores were calculated for each app (> 8 indicates high quality). Results: Evaluators highly rated app function and purpose for WebMD Baby (8.0 ± 1.8 and 8.2 ± 0.9, respectively) and Baby Center (8.0 ± 2.1 and 8.0 ± 2.6, respectively). For other apps, no domains were highly rated. No apps were rated highly for appropriateness (range 5.7–7.7) nor provided high-quality infant-feeding information for mothers with low income. Few apps were rated highly appropriate for mothers who are Black or Hispanic. Conclusions and Implications: Commercially available infant-feeding apps are of limited quality, indicating the need to develop high-quality apps for audiences with low income and Black and Hispanic identities.
KW - breastfeeding
KW - complementary feeding
KW - economic status
KW - ethnic and racial minorities
KW - mobile applications
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85165607087&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85165607087&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jneb.2023.05.249
DO - 10.1016/j.jneb.2023.05.249
M3 - Article
C2 - 37389498
AN - SCOPUS:85165607087
SN - 1499-4046
VL - 55
SP - 604
EP - 611
JO - Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior
JF - Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior
IS - 8
ER -