TY - JOUR
T1 - Evaluation of combinations of nisin, lauric arginate, and ε-polylysine to control Listeria monocytogenes in queso fresco
AU - Martínez-Ramos, Alma R.
AU - Ibarra-Sánchez, Luis A.
AU - Amaya-Llano, Silvia L.
AU - Miller, Michael J.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 American Dairy Science Association
PY - 2020/12
Y1 - 2020/12
N2 - Listeria monocytogenes contamination is of great concern in queso fresco (QF), and listeriosis outbreaks linked to consumption of QF continue to happen. Hurdle approaches such as combining antimicrobials provide an alternative to improve QF safety. In this work, the efficacy of antimicrobial combinations of nisin (NIS), lauric arginate (LAE), and ε-polylysine (EPL) to inhibit L. monocytogenes growth in QF was evaluated. First, antimicrobials were screened for potential synergy in vitro. Later, antimicrobial treatments were challenged in QF inoculated with ∼4 log10 cfu/g of L. monocytogenes 5-strain cocktail and stored for 28 d at 4°C. Our results showed that combinations of NIS-LAE and EPL-LAE were synergistic in vitro. Limited antilisterial control was observed in QF treated with NIS, LAE, and NIS-LAE; however, EPL and EPL-LAE exhibited listeristatic effect in QF for up to 14 and 28 d of cold storage, respectively. Additionally, L. monocytogenes QF isolates had similar susceptibility to EPL or LAE. A consumer panel was able to distinguish between QF added with EPL (250 µg/g) + LAE (66.66 µg/g) and control QF, most likely associated with manufacturing and storage rather than antimicrobials' taste. Our results support the use of EPL-LAE combination to control L. monocytogenes growth in QF.
AB - Listeria monocytogenes contamination is of great concern in queso fresco (QF), and listeriosis outbreaks linked to consumption of QF continue to happen. Hurdle approaches such as combining antimicrobials provide an alternative to improve QF safety. In this work, the efficacy of antimicrobial combinations of nisin (NIS), lauric arginate (LAE), and ε-polylysine (EPL) to inhibit L. monocytogenes growth in QF was evaluated. First, antimicrobials were screened for potential synergy in vitro. Later, antimicrobial treatments were challenged in QF inoculated with ∼4 log10 cfu/g of L. monocytogenes 5-strain cocktail and stored for 28 d at 4°C. Our results showed that combinations of NIS-LAE and EPL-LAE were synergistic in vitro. Limited antilisterial control was observed in QF treated with NIS, LAE, and NIS-LAE; however, EPL and EPL-LAE exhibited listeristatic effect in QF for up to 14 and 28 d of cold storage, respectively. Additionally, L. monocytogenes QF isolates had similar susceptibility to EPL or LAE. A consumer panel was able to distinguish between QF added with EPL (250 µg/g) + LAE (66.66 µg/g) and control QF, most likely associated with manufacturing and storage rather than antimicrobials' taste. Our results support the use of EPL-LAE combination to control L. monocytogenes growth in QF.
KW - Listeria monocytogenes
KW - lauric arginate
KW - nisin
KW - queso fresco
KW - ε-polylysine
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85092261923&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85092261923&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.3168/jds.2020-19001
DO - 10.3168/jds.2020-19001
M3 - Article
C2 - 33041032
AN - SCOPUS:85092261923
SN - 0022-0302
VL - 103
SP - 11152
EP - 11162
JO - Journal of Dairy Science
JF - Journal of Dairy Science
IS - 12
ER -