TY - JOUR
T1 - Evaluating the impact of broadband access and internet use in a small underserved rural community
AU - Valentín-Sívico, Javier
AU - Canfield, Casey
AU - Low, Sarah A.
AU - Gollnick, Christel
N1 - This work is based on a collaborative effort. The team includes Alexander Wyglinski, Shamsnaz V. Bhada, Andrew Aeschliman, Darren Farnan, Joseph R. Murphy, Debra D. Davis, Maya S. Ellis, Dante Uccello, Mariko Endo, Ankit Agarwal, Carlee Quinn, and Tarunjot K. Sethi. In addition, we would like to thank Hannah Roos for assistance generating maps. This work was supported by a grant through the technology nonprofit US Ignite , which provided administrative and cohort facilitation support. The National Science Foundation is funding this work in part under Cooperative Agreement 2044448 . This research was also supported by the U.S. Department of Education GAANN Fellowship Program ( P200A180066 ).
In response to the COVID-19 pandemic, the U.S. federal government authorized $87 billion in funding for broadband access and adoption. This figure includes $65 billion from the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act, to address the digital divide, $20.4 billion for funding digital equity policies from the American Rescue Plan, and $1.6 billion from the Consolidated Appropriations Act, for connecting minority communities, connectivity in tribal lands, and general broadband infrastructure deployment ( CRS, 2021 ; NTIA, 2021 ; Tomer & George, 2021 ). These funds will be administered by different federal agencies, such as the FCC and the National Telecommunications and Information Administration (NTIA), as well as by the states and U.S. territories.
PY - 2023/5
Y1 - 2023/5
N2 - Having adequate access to the internet at home enhances quality-of-life for households and facilitates economic and social opportunities. Despite increased investment in response to the COVID-19 pandemic, millions of households in the rural United States still lack adequate access to high-speed internet. In this study, we evaluate a wireless broadband network deployed in Turney, a small, underserved rural community in northwest Missouri. In addition to collecting survey data before and after this internet intervention, we collected pre-treatment and post-treatment survey data from comparison communities to serve as a control group. Due to technical constraints, some of Turney's interested participants could not connect to the network, creating an additional comparison group. These comparisons suggest two primary findings, (1) changes in using the internet for employment, education, and health could not be directly attributed to the internet intervention, and (2) the internet intervention was associated with benefits stemming from the ability to use multiple devices at once. This study has implications for the design of future broadband evaluation studies, particularly those examining underserved rather than unserved communities. Recommendations for identifying appropriate outcome variables, executing recruitment strategies, and selecting the timing of surveys are made.
AB - Having adequate access to the internet at home enhances quality-of-life for households and facilitates economic and social opportunities. Despite increased investment in response to the COVID-19 pandemic, millions of households in the rural United States still lack adequate access to high-speed internet. In this study, we evaluate a wireless broadband network deployed in Turney, a small, underserved rural community in northwest Missouri. In addition to collecting survey data before and after this internet intervention, we collected pre-treatment and post-treatment survey data from comparison communities to serve as a control group. Due to technical constraints, some of Turney's interested participants could not connect to the network, creating an additional comparison group. These comparisons suggest two primary findings, (1) changes in using the internet for employment, education, and health could not be directly attributed to the internet intervention, and (2) the internet intervention was associated with benefits stemming from the ability to use multiple devices at once. This study has implications for the design of future broadband evaluation studies, particularly those examining underserved rather than unserved communities. Recommendations for identifying appropriate outcome variables, executing recruitment strategies, and selecting the timing of surveys are made.
KW - Economic and social benefits
KW - Evaluation
KW - Rural broadband
KW - Underserved community
KW - Wireless
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85146147342&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85146147342&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.telpol.2023.102499
DO - 10.1016/j.telpol.2023.102499
M3 - Article
C2 - 36685614
AN - SCOPUS:85146147342
SN - 0308-5961
VL - 47
JO - Telecommunications Policy
JF - Telecommunications Policy
IS - 4
M1 - 102499
ER -