Evaluating the Efficacy of a Special Education Advocacy Training Program

Meghan Maureen Burke, Samantha E. Goldman, Melanie S. Hart, Robert M. Hodapp

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Increasingly, parents are relying on advocates to ensure that children with disabilities receive appropriate educational services. As agencies begin to train advocates to work with families, it is necessary to evaluate the efficacy of such advocacy training programs. This study evaluated the efficacy of the Volunteer Advocacy Project (VAP), a 40-h training workshop that has been delivered since 2008 to six cohorts live and via webcasts. The aim of the study was to determine whether the VAP increased the knowledge and advocacy skills of its trainees and how trainee and training characteristics related to the effectiveness of the training. This study examined changes from pretest to posttest knowledge and advocacy skills of 90 trainees of the VAP. We also examined interactions between pre/post change and trainee and training characteristics. Participants demonstrated significant gains from pre- to posttests in their knowledge of special education and in their advocacy skills. Those participants who partook of the training in latter cohorts and at distance sites showed more progress in special education knowledge. Increases in advocacy skills differed by type of participant: compared to parent participants, professionals demonstrated significantly greater pre/post test increases in advocacy skills. This study has important implications for researchers, practitioners, and policymakers.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)269-276
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of Policy and Practice in Intellectual Disabilities
Volume13
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 1 2016

Fingerprint

Special Education
special education
training program
Volunteers
trainee
Education
Webcasts
Disabled Children
parents
Parents
Research Personnel
disability
interaction

Keywords

  • advocacy
  • intellectual disability
  • parent
  • training

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Health(social science)
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Cite this

Evaluating the Efficacy of a Special Education Advocacy Training Program. / Burke, Meghan Maureen; Goldman, Samantha E.; Hart, Melanie S.; Hodapp, Robert M.

In: Journal of Policy and Practice in Intellectual Disabilities, Vol. 13, No. 4, 01.12.2016, p. 269-276.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Burke, Meghan Maureen ; Goldman, Samantha E. ; Hart, Melanie S. ; Hodapp, Robert M. / Evaluating the Efficacy of a Special Education Advocacy Training Program. In: Journal of Policy and Practice in Intellectual Disabilities. 2016 ; Vol. 13, No. 4. pp. 269-276.
@article{ed717c4ba6344b94b1228452c0b6dbf8,
title = "Evaluating the Efficacy of a Special Education Advocacy Training Program",
abstract = "Increasingly, parents are relying on advocates to ensure that children with disabilities receive appropriate educational services. As agencies begin to train advocates to work with families, it is necessary to evaluate the efficacy of such advocacy training programs. This study evaluated the efficacy of the Volunteer Advocacy Project (VAP), a 40-h training workshop that has been delivered since 2008 to six cohorts live and via webcasts. The aim of the study was to determine whether the VAP increased the knowledge and advocacy skills of its trainees and how trainee and training characteristics related to the effectiveness of the training. This study examined changes from pretest to posttest knowledge and advocacy skills of 90 trainees of the VAP. We also examined interactions between pre/post change and trainee and training characteristics. Participants demonstrated significant gains from pre- to posttests in their knowledge of special education and in their advocacy skills. Those participants who partook of the training in latter cohorts and at distance sites showed more progress in special education knowledge. Increases in advocacy skills differed by type of participant: compared to parent participants, professionals demonstrated significantly greater pre/post test increases in advocacy skills. This study has important implications for researchers, practitioners, and policymakers.",
keywords = "advocacy, intellectual disability, parent, training",
author = "Burke, {Meghan Maureen} and Goldman, {Samantha E.} and Hart, {Melanie S.} and Hodapp, {Robert M.}",
year = "2016",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/jppi.12183",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "13",
pages = "269--276",
journal = "Journal of Policy and Practice in Intellectual Disabilities",
issn = "1741-1122",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Evaluating the Efficacy of a Special Education Advocacy Training Program

AU - Burke, Meghan Maureen

AU - Goldman, Samantha E.

AU - Hart, Melanie S.

AU - Hodapp, Robert M.

PY - 2016/12/1

Y1 - 2016/12/1

N2 - Increasingly, parents are relying on advocates to ensure that children with disabilities receive appropriate educational services. As agencies begin to train advocates to work with families, it is necessary to evaluate the efficacy of such advocacy training programs. This study evaluated the efficacy of the Volunteer Advocacy Project (VAP), a 40-h training workshop that has been delivered since 2008 to six cohorts live and via webcasts. The aim of the study was to determine whether the VAP increased the knowledge and advocacy skills of its trainees and how trainee and training characteristics related to the effectiveness of the training. This study examined changes from pretest to posttest knowledge and advocacy skills of 90 trainees of the VAP. We also examined interactions between pre/post change and trainee and training characteristics. Participants demonstrated significant gains from pre- to posttests in their knowledge of special education and in their advocacy skills. Those participants who partook of the training in latter cohorts and at distance sites showed more progress in special education knowledge. Increases in advocacy skills differed by type of participant: compared to parent participants, professionals demonstrated significantly greater pre/post test increases in advocacy skills. This study has important implications for researchers, practitioners, and policymakers.

AB - Increasingly, parents are relying on advocates to ensure that children with disabilities receive appropriate educational services. As agencies begin to train advocates to work with families, it is necessary to evaluate the efficacy of such advocacy training programs. This study evaluated the efficacy of the Volunteer Advocacy Project (VAP), a 40-h training workshop that has been delivered since 2008 to six cohorts live and via webcasts. The aim of the study was to determine whether the VAP increased the knowledge and advocacy skills of its trainees and how trainee and training characteristics related to the effectiveness of the training. This study examined changes from pretest to posttest knowledge and advocacy skills of 90 trainees of the VAP. We also examined interactions between pre/post change and trainee and training characteristics. Participants demonstrated significant gains from pre- to posttests in their knowledge of special education and in their advocacy skills. Those participants who partook of the training in latter cohorts and at distance sites showed more progress in special education knowledge. Increases in advocacy skills differed by type of participant: compared to parent participants, professionals demonstrated significantly greater pre/post test increases in advocacy skills. This study has important implications for researchers, practitioners, and policymakers.

KW - advocacy

KW - intellectual disability

KW - parent

KW - training

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84995920414&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84995920414&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/jppi.12183

DO - 10.1111/jppi.12183

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84995920414

VL - 13

SP - 269

EP - 276

JO - Journal of Policy and Practice in Intellectual Disabilities

JF - Journal of Policy and Practice in Intellectual Disabilities

SN - 1741-1122

IS - 4

ER -