Evaluating the Development of Biocatalytic Technology for the Targeted Removal of Perchlorate from Drinking Water

Justin M. Hutchison, Jeremy S. Guest, Julie L. Zilles

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Removing micropollutants is challenging in part because of their toxicity at low concentrations. A biocatalytic approach could harness the high affinity of enzymes for their substrates to address this challenge. The potential of biocatalysis relative to mature (nonselective ion exchange, selective ion exchange, and whole-cell biological reduction) and emerging (catalysis) perchlorate-removal technologies was evaluated through a quantitative sustainable design framework, and research objectives were prioritized to advance economic and environmental sustainability. In its current undeveloped state, the biocatalytic technology was approximately 1 order of magnitude higher in cost and environmental impact than nonselective ion exchange. Biocatalyst production was highly correlated with cost and impact. Realistic improvement scenarios targeting biocatalyst yield, biocatalyst immobilization for reuse, and elimination of an electron shuttle could reduce total costs to $0.034 m-3 and global warming potential (GWP) to 0.051 kg CO2 eq m-3: roughly 6.5% of cost and 7.3% of GWP of the background from drinking water treatment and competitive with the best performing technology, selective ion exchange. With less stringent perchlorate regulatory limits, ion exchange technologies had increased cost and impact, in contrast to biocatalytic and catalytic technologies. Targeted advances in biocatalysis could provide affordable and sustainable treatment options to protect the public from micropollutants.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)7178-7186
Number of pages9
JournalEnvironmental Science and Technology
Volume51
Issue number12
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 20 2017

Fingerprint

Acyclic Acids
Diaphragmatic Hernia
Costs
ion exchange
cost
perchlorate
Biocatalysis
Global warming
Removal
global warming
drinking water
Transmissible Enteritis of Turkeys
Caprylates
Cortodoxone
Acrodermatitis
Tinea
Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage
Feasibility Studies
Water treatment
Electrons

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Chemistry(all)
  • Environmental Chemistry

Cite this

Hutchison, Justin M.; Guest, Jeremy S.; Zilles, Julie L. / Evaluating the Development of Biocatalytic Technology for the Targeted Removal of Perchlorate from Drinking Water.

In: Environmental Science and Technology, Vol. 51, No. 12, 20.06.2017, p. 7178-7186.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{800c5b40f4d743a79140d01ad3bfd792,
title = "Evaluating the Development of Biocatalytic Technology for the Targeted Removal of Perchlorate from Drinking Water",
abstract = "Removing micropollutants is challenging in part because of their toxicity at low concentrations. A biocatalytic approach could harness the high affinity of enzymes for their substrates to address this challenge. The potential of biocatalysis relative to mature (nonselective ion exchange, selective ion exchange, and whole-cell biological reduction) and emerging (catalysis) perchlorate-removal technologies was evaluated through a quantitative sustainable design framework, and research objectives were prioritized to advance economic and environmental sustainability. In its current undeveloped state, the biocatalytic technology was approximately 1 order of magnitude higher in cost and environmental impact than nonselective ion exchange. Biocatalyst production was highly correlated with cost and impact. Realistic improvement scenarios targeting biocatalyst yield, biocatalyst immobilization for reuse, and elimination of an electron shuttle could reduce total costs to $0.034 m-3 and global warming potential (GWP) to 0.051 kg CO2 eq m-3: roughly 6.5% of cost and 7.3% of GWP of the background from drinking water treatment and competitive with the best performing technology, selective ion exchange. With less stringent perchlorate regulatory limits, ion exchange technologies had increased cost and impact, in contrast to biocatalytic and catalytic technologies. Targeted advances in biocatalysis could provide affordable and sustainable treatment options to protect the public from micropollutants.",
author = "Hutchison, {Justin M.} and Guest, {Jeremy S.} and Zilles, {Julie L.}",
year = "2017",
month = "6",
doi = "10.1021/acs.est.7b00831",
volume = "51",
pages = "7178--7186",
journal = "Environmental Science and Technology",
issn = "0013-936X",
publisher = "American Chemical Society",
number = "12",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Evaluating the Development of Biocatalytic Technology for the Targeted Removal of Perchlorate from Drinking Water

AU - Hutchison,Justin M.

AU - Guest,Jeremy S.

AU - Zilles,Julie L.

PY - 2017/6/20

Y1 - 2017/6/20

N2 - Removing micropollutants is challenging in part because of their toxicity at low concentrations. A biocatalytic approach could harness the high affinity of enzymes for their substrates to address this challenge. The potential of biocatalysis relative to mature (nonselective ion exchange, selective ion exchange, and whole-cell biological reduction) and emerging (catalysis) perchlorate-removal technologies was evaluated through a quantitative sustainable design framework, and research objectives were prioritized to advance economic and environmental sustainability. In its current undeveloped state, the biocatalytic technology was approximately 1 order of magnitude higher in cost and environmental impact than nonselective ion exchange. Biocatalyst production was highly correlated with cost and impact. Realistic improvement scenarios targeting biocatalyst yield, biocatalyst immobilization for reuse, and elimination of an electron shuttle could reduce total costs to $0.034 m-3 and global warming potential (GWP) to 0.051 kg CO2 eq m-3: roughly 6.5% of cost and 7.3% of GWP of the background from drinking water treatment and competitive with the best performing technology, selective ion exchange. With less stringent perchlorate regulatory limits, ion exchange technologies had increased cost and impact, in contrast to biocatalytic and catalytic technologies. Targeted advances in biocatalysis could provide affordable and sustainable treatment options to protect the public from micropollutants.

AB - Removing micropollutants is challenging in part because of their toxicity at low concentrations. A biocatalytic approach could harness the high affinity of enzymes for their substrates to address this challenge. The potential of biocatalysis relative to mature (nonselective ion exchange, selective ion exchange, and whole-cell biological reduction) and emerging (catalysis) perchlorate-removal technologies was evaluated through a quantitative sustainable design framework, and research objectives were prioritized to advance economic and environmental sustainability. In its current undeveloped state, the biocatalytic technology was approximately 1 order of magnitude higher in cost and environmental impact than nonselective ion exchange. Biocatalyst production was highly correlated with cost and impact. Realistic improvement scenarios targeting biocatalyst yield, biocatalyst immobilization for reuse, and elimination of an electron shuttle could reduce total costs to $0.034 m-3 and global warming potential (GWP) to 0.051 kg CO2 eq m-3: roughly 6.5% of cost and 7.3% of GWP of the background from drinking water treatment and competitive with the best performing technology, selective ion exchange. With less stringent perchlorate regulatory limits, ion exchange technologies had increased cost and impact, in contrast to biocatalytic and catalytic technologies. Targeted advances in biocatalysis could provide affordable and sustainable treatment options to protect the public from micropollutants.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85021677472&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85021677472&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1021/acs.est.7b00831

DO - 10.1021/acs.est.7b00831

M3 - Article

VL - 51

SP - 7178

EP - 7186

JO - Environmental Science and Technology

T2 - Environmental Science and Technology

JF - Environmental Science and Technology

SN - 0013-936X

IS - 12

ER -