TY - JOUR
T1 - Essence and Realization in the Ontological Argument
AU - McCarthy, Timothy G.
PY - 2016/1
Y1 - 2016/1
N2 - A persistent complaint about modal forms of the ontological argument is that the characteristic modalized existence assumptions of these arguments are simply too close to the conclusion to be of much probative value in establishing it. I present an abstract form of the ontological argument in which the properties imputed to the divine nature by these assumptions are replaced by any of a wide class of properties of a sort I call "actualizing." These include basic theistic attributes such as authorship, sovereignty and omniscience. The import of these arguments is to show that the metaphysical coherence of some of the most familiar conceptions of the divine nature ensures their actual realization.
AB - A persistent complaint about modal forms of the ontological argument is that the characteristic modalized existence assumptions of these arguments are simply too close to the conclusion to be of much probative value in establishing it. I present an abstract form of the ontological argument in which the properties imputed to the divine nature by these assumptions are replaced by any of a wide class of properties of a sort I call "actualizing." These include basic theistic attributes such as authorship, sovereignty and omniscience. The import of these arguments is to show that the metaphysical coherence of some of the most familiar conceptions of the divine nature ensures their actual realization.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84959891931&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84959891931&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.5840/faithphil20163312
DO - 10.5840/faithphil20163312
M3 - Review article
AN - SCOPUS:84959891931
SN - 0739-7046
VL - 33
SP - 5
EP - 24
JO - Faith and Philosophy
JF - Faith and Philosophy
IS - 1
ER -