Abstract

Recent research has identified several vulnerable areas in heritage language grammars, among which morphosyntax is among the most affected. In this study, we report on the morphosyntactic competence of Hindi heritage speakers living in the U.S and show that these speakers have representational problems with ergative, accusative and dative case morphology, albeit to different degrees. Hindi is a split ergative language with a complex interaction of case and agreement. Transitive predicates in perfective aspect co-occur with subjects marked with ergative case (-ne) and object agreement. Animate specific direct objects are marked with the particle -ko, and so are the indirect objects and dative subjects. 21 Hindi native speakers and 28 Hindi heritage speakers completed a sociolinguistic questionnaire, a Hindi cloze test, an oral narrative task and a bimodal acceptability judgment task. The results showed significant differences between the fluent native speakers and the heritage speakers on all measures.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)141-176
Number of pages36
JournalLinguistic Approaches to Bilingualism
Volume2
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2012

Fingerprint

erosion
sociolinguistics
language
grammar
narrative
questionnaire
interaction
Heritage Speakers
Erosion
Ergative Case
Native Speaker
Indirect Object
Perfective Aspect
Ergative Languages
Transitive
Animate
Questionnaire
Accusative Case
Oral Narrative
Heritage Language

Keywords

  • Agreement
  • Attrition
  • Case marking
  • Ergativity
  • Heritage speakers
  • Hindi syntax
  • Morphosyntax

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Language and Linguistics
  • Linguistics and Language

Cite this

Erosion of case and agreement in Hindi heritage speakers. / Montrul, Silvina; Bhatt, Rakesh; Bhatia, Archna.

In: Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, Vol. 2, No. 2, 01.01.2012, p. 141-176.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{62ea699fd6bc46cb8e2d4af9d783564b,
title = "Erosion of case and agreement in Hindi heritage speakers",
abstract = "Recent research has identified several vulnerable areas in heritage language grammars, among which morphosyntax is among the most affected. In this study, we report on the morphosyntactic competence of Hindi heritage speakers living in the U.S and show that these speakers have representational problems with ergative, accusative and dative case morphology, albeit to different degrees. Hindi is a split ergative language with a complex interaction of case and agreement. Transitive predicates in perfective aspect co-occur with subjects marked with ergative case (-ne) and object agreement. Animate specific direct objects are marked with the particle -ko, and so are the indirect objects and dative subjects. 21 Hindi native speakers and 28 Hindi heritage speakers completed a sociolinguistic questionnaire, a Hindi cloze test, an oral narrative task and a bimodal acceptability judgment task. The results showed significant differences between the fluent native speakers and the heritage speakers on all measures.",
keywords = "Agreement, Attrition, Case marking, Ergativity, Heritage speakers, Hindi syntax, Morphosyntax",
author = "Silvina Montrul and Rakesh Bhatt and Archna Bhatia",
year = "2012",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1075/lab.2.2.02mon",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "2",
pages = "141--176",
journal = "Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism",
issn = "1879-9264",
publisher = "John Benjamins Publishing Company",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Erosion of case and agreement in Hindi heritage speakers

AU - Montrul, Silvina

AU - Bhatt, Rakesh

AU - Bhatia, Archna

PY - 2012/1/1

Y1 - 2012/1/1

N2 - Recent research has identified several vulnerable areas in heritage language grammars, among which morphosyntax is among the most affected. In this study, we report on the morphosyntactic competence of Hindi heritage speakers living in the U.S and show that these speakers have representational problems with ergative, accusative and dative case morphology, albeit to different degrees. Hindi is a split ergative language with a complex interaction of case and agreement. Transitive predicates in perfective aspect co-occur with subjects marked with ergative case (-ne) and object agreement. Animate specific direct objects are marked with the particle -ko, and so are the indirect objects and dative subjects. 21 Hindi native speakers and 28 Hindi heritage speakers completed a sociolinguistic questionnaire, a Hindi cloze test, an oral narrative task and a bimodal acceptability judgment task. The results showed significant differences between the fluent native speakers and the heritage speakers on all measures.

AB - Recent research has identified several vulnerable areas in heritage language grammars, among which morphosyntax is among the most affected. In this study, we report on the morphosyntactic competence of Hindi heritage speakers living in the U.S and show that these speakers have representational problems with ergative, accusative and dative case morphology, albeit to different degrees. Hindi is a split ergative language with a complex interaction of case and agreement. Transitive predicates in perfective aspect co-occur with subjects marked with ergative case (-ne) and object agreement. Animate specific direct objects are marked with the particle -ko, and so are the indirect objects and dative subjects. 21 Hindi native speakers and 28 Hindi heritage speakers completed a sociolinguistic questionnaire, a Hindi cloze test, an oral narrative task and a bimodal acceptability judgment task. The results showed significant differences between the fluent native speakers and the heritage speakers on all measures.

KW - Agreement

KW - Attrition

KW - Case marking

KW - Ergativity

KW - Heritage speakers

KW - Hindi syntax

KW - Morphosyntax

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84989390078&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84989390078&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1075/lab.2.2.02mon

DO - 10.1075/lab.2.2.02mon

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84989390078

VL - 2

SP - 141

EP - 176

JO - Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism

JF - Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism

SN - 1879-9264

IS - 2

ER -