Equivalent modal damping, stiffening and energy exchanges in multi-degree-of-freedom systems with strongly nonlinear attachments

D. Dane Quinn, Sean Hubbard, Nicholas Wierschem, Mohammad A. Al-Shudeifat, Richard J. Ott, Jie Luo, Billie F. Spencer, D. Michael McFarland, Alexander F. Vakakis, Lawrence A. Bergman

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

We consider the response of a linear structural system when coupled to an attachment containing strong or even essential nonlinearities. For this system, the attachment, designated as a nonlinear energy sink, is designed as a nonlinear vibration absorber, serving to dissipate energy from the structural system. Moreover, the attachment not only leads to a reduction in the total energy of the system, but also nonlinearly couples together the vibration modes of the linear structural system. When the structure is impulsively loaded, the nonlinear energy sink serves to both dissipate and redistribute energy, thus enhancing the observed structural dissipation. The effect of the nonlinear attachment on the linear primary system can be quantified in terms of equivalent measures for the damping and frequency of each mode, derived through consideration of the instantaneous energy balance in each mode. The influence of the nonlinear energy sink on the structural response is illustrated with an impulsively forced two-degree-of-freedom primary system, representing a two-story structure, with different types of nonlinear energy sink attached to the top floor. We perform optimization studies in order to design the nonlinear energy sink for optimal shock mitigation of the primary system. The proposed methodology is based only on measured time series without resorting to frequency analysis. As such, it is valid for strongly nonlinear systems as well as for systems with nonsmooth nonlinearities, and is suited to both simulated and experimental results. Finally, an experimental validation of the enhanced dissipation introduced by the nonlinear energy sink is provided, and the experimental response is compared against numerical simulation of the corresponding analytical model to illustrate the effectiveness of the nonlinear energy sink design. Thus, we analytically predict and experimentally verify the efficacy of the nonlinear energy sink to significantly reduce the response of the two degree-of-freedom system subject to shock excitation.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)122-146
Number of pages25
JournalProceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part K: Journal of Multi-body Dynamics
Volume226
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 1 2012

Fingerprint

stiffening
Degrees of freedom (mechanics)
attachment
degrees of freedom
Damping
damping
energy transfer
sinks
Energy balance
Nonlinear systems
Time series
Analytical models
energy
Computer simulation
dissipation
shock
nonlinearity
nonlinear systems
vibration mode
absorbers

Keywords

  • Structural damping
  • essential nonlinearities
  • experimental analysis
  • modeling and simulation
  • shock mitigation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Condensed Matter Physics
  • Mechanical Engineering

Cite this

Equivalent modal damping, stiffening and energy exchanges in multi-degree-of-freedom systems with strongly nonlinear attachments. / Quinn, D. Dane; Hubbard, Sean; Wierschem, Nicholas; Al-Shudeifat, Mohammad A.; Ott, Richard J.; Luo, Jie; Spencer, Billie F.; McFarland, D. Michael; Vakakis, Alexander F.; Bergman, Lawrence A.

In: Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part K: Journal of Multi-body Dynamics, Vol. 226, No. 2, 01.06.2012, p. 122-146.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Quinn, D. Dane ; Hubbard, Sean ; Wierschem, Nicholas ; Al-Shudeifat, Mohammad A. ; Ott, Richard J. ; Luo, Jie ; Spencer, Billie F. ; McFarland, D. Michael ; Vakakis, Alexander F. ; Bergman, Lawrence A. / Equivalent modal damping, stiffening and energy exchanges in multi-degree-of-freedom systems with strongly nonlinear attachments. In: Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part K: Journal of Multi-body Dynamics. 2012 ; Vol. 226, No. 2. pp. 122-146.
@article{cbd35b59c2994075ab86d36074de3252,
title = "Equivalent modal damping, stiffening and energy exchanges in multi-degree-of-freedom systems with strongly nonlinear attachments",
abstract = "We consider the response of a linear structural system when coupled to an attachment containing strong or even essential nonlinearities. For this system, the attachment, designated as a nonlinear energy sink, is designed as a nonlinear vibration absorber, serving to dissipate energy from the structural system. Moreover, the attachment not only leads to a reduction in the total energy of the system, but also nonlinearly couples together the vibration modes of the linear structural system. When the structure is impulsively loaded, the nonlinear energy sink serves to both dissipate and redistribute energy, thus enhancing the observed structural dissipation. The effect of the nonlinear attachment on the linear primary system can be quantified in terms of equivalent measures for the damping and frequency of each mode, derived through consideration of the instantaneous energy balance in each mode. The influence of the nonlinear energy sink on the structural response is illustrated with an impulsively forced two-degree-of-freedom primary system, representing a two-story structure, with different types of nonlinear energy sink attached to the top floor. We perform optimization studies in order to design the nonlinear energy sink for optimal shock mitigation of the primary system. The proposed methodology is based only on measured time series without resorting to frequency analysis. As such, it is valid for strongly nonlinear systems as well as for systems with nonsmooth nonlinearities, and is suited to both simulated and experimental results. Finally, an experimental validation of the enhanced dissipation introduced by the nonlinear energy sink is provided, and the experimental response is compared against numerical simulation of the corresponding analytical model to illustrate the effectiveness of the nonlinear energy sink design. Thus, we analytically predict and experimentally verify the efficacy of the nonlinear energy sink to significantly reduce the response of the two degree-of-freedom system subject to shock excitation.",
keywords = "Structural damping, essential nonlinearities, experimental analysis, modeling and simulation, shock mitigation",
author = "Quinn, {D. Dane} and Sean Hubbard and Nicholas Wierschem and Al-Shudeifat, {Mohammad A.} and Ott, {Richard J.} and Jie Luo and Spencer, {Billie F.} and McFarland, {D. Michael} and Vakakis, {Alexander F.} and Bergman, {Lawrence A.}",
year = "2012",
month = "6",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/1464419311432671",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "226",
pages = "122--146",
journal = "Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part K: Journal of Multi-body Dynamics",
issn = "1464-4193",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Ltd",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Equivalent modal damping, stiffening and energy exchanges in multi-degree-of-freedom systems with strongly nonlinear attachments

AU - Quinn, D. Dane

AU - Hubbard, Sean

AU - Wierschem, Nicholas

AU - Al-Shudeifat, Mohammad A.

AU - Ott, Richard J.

AU - Luo, Jie

AU - Spencer, Billie F.

AU - McFarland, D. Michael

AU - Vakakis, Alexander F.

AU - Bergman, Lawrence A.

PY - 2012/6/1

Y1 - 2012/6/1

N2 - We consider the response of a linear structural system when coupled to an attachment containing strong or even essential nonlinearities. For this system, the attachment, designated as a nonlinear energy sink, is designed as a nonlinear vibration absorber, serving to dissipate energy from the structural system. Moreover, the attachment not only leads to a reduction in the total energy of the system, but also nonlinearly couples together the vibration modes of the linear structural system. When the structure is impulsively loaded, the nonlinear energy sink serves to both dissipate and redistribute energy, thus enhancing the observed structural dissipation. The effect of the nonlinear attachment on the linear primary system can be quantified in terms of equivalent measures for the damping and frequency of each mode, derived through consideration of the instantaneous energy balance in each mode. The influence of the nonlinear energy sink on the structural response is illustrated with an impulsively forced two-degree-of-freedom primary system, representing a two-story structure, with different types of nonlinear energy sink attached to the top floor. We perform optimization studies in order to design the nonlinear energy sink for optimal shock mitigation of the primary system. The proposed methodology is based only on measured time series without resorting to frequency analysis. As such, it is valid for strongly nonlinear systems as well as for systems with nonsmooth nonlinearities, and is suited to both simulated and experimental results. Finally, an experimental validation of the enhanced dissipation introduced by the nonlinear energy sink is provided, and the experimental response is compared against numerical simulation of the corresponding analytical model to illustrate the effectiveness of the nonlinear energy sink design. Thus, we analytically predict and experimentally verify the efficacy of the nonlinear energy sink to significantly reduce the response of the two degree-of-freedom system subject to shock excitation.

AB - We consider the response of a linear structural system when coupled to an attachment containing strong or even essential nonlinearities. For this system, the attachment, designated as a nonlinear energy sink, is designed as a nonlinear vibration absorber, serving to dissipate energy from the structural system. Moreover, the attachment not only leads to a reduction in the total energy of the system, but also nonlinearly couples together the vibration modes of the linear structural system. When the structure is impulsively loaded, the nonlinear energy sink serves to both dissipate and redistribute energy, thus enhancing the observed structural dissipation. The effect of the nonlinear attachment on the linear primary system can be quantified in terms of equivalent measures for the damping and frequency of each mode, derived through consideration of the instantaneous energy balance in each mode. The influence of the nonlinear energy sink on the structural response is illustrated with an impulsively forced two-degree-of-freedom primary system, representing a two-story structure, with different types of nonlinear energy sink attached to the top floor. We perform optimization studies in order to design the nonlinear energy sink for optimal shock mitigation of the primary system. The proposed methodology is based only on measured time series without resorting to frequency analysis. As such, it is valid for strongly nonlinear systems as well as for systems with nonsmooth nonlinearities, and is suited to both simulated and experimental results. Finally, an experimental validation of the enhanced dissipation introduced by the nonlinear energy sink is provided, and the experimental response is compared against numerical simulation of the corresponding analytical model to illustrate the effectiveness of the nonlinear energy sink design. Thus, we analytically predict and experimentally verify the efficacy of the nonlinear energy sink to significantly reduce the response of the two degree-of-freedom system subject to shock excitation.

KW - Structural damping

KW - essential nonlinearities

KW - experimental analysis

KW - modeling and simulation

KW - shock mitigation

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84865691659&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84865691659&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/1464419311432671

DO - 10.1177/1464419311432671

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84865691659

VL - 226

SP - 122

EP - 146

JO - Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part K: Journal of Multi-body Dynamics

JF - Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part K: Journal of Multi-body Dynamics

SN - 1464-4193

IS - 2

ER -