Equivalence of Narcissistic Personality Inventory constructs and correlates across scoring approaches and response formats

Eunike Wetzel, Brent W. Roberts, R. Chris Fraley, Anna Brown

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

The prevalent scoring practice for the Narcissistic Personality Inventory (NPI) ignores the forced-choice nature of the items. The aim of this study was to investigate whether findings based on NPI scores reported in previous research can be confirmed when the forced-choice nature of the NPI's original response format is appropriately modeled, and when NPI items are presented in different response formats (true/false or rating scale). The relationships between NPI facets and various criteria were robust across scoring approaches (mean score vs. model-based), but were only partly robust across response formats. In addition, the scoring approaches and response formats achieved equivalent measurements of the vanity facet and in part of the leadership facet, but differed with respect to the entitlement facet.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)87-98
Number of pages12
JournalJournal of Research in Personality
Volume61
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 1 2016

Keywords

  • Forced-choice
  • Narcissism
  • Narcissistic Personality Inventory
  • Response format
  • Thurstonian item response model

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Social Psychology
  • General Psychology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Equivalence of Narcissistic Personality Inventory constructs and correlates across scoring approaches and response formats'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this