Abstract
The prevalent scoring practice for the Narcissistic Personality Inventory (NPI) ignores the forced-choice nature of the items. The aim of this study was to investigate whether findings based on NPI scores reported in previous research can be confirmed when the forced-choice nature of the NPI's original response format is appropriately modeled, and when NPI items are presented in different response formats (true/false or rating scale). The relationships between NPI facets and various criteria were robust across scoring approaches (mean score vs. model-based), but were only partly robust across response formats. In addition, the scoring approaches and response formats achieved equivalent measurements of the vanity facet and in part of the leadership facet, but differed with respect to the entitlement facet.
Original language | English (US) |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 87-98 |
Number of pages | 12 |
Journal | Journal of Research in Personality |
Volume | 61 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - Apr 1 2016 |
Keywords
- Forced-choice
- Narcissism
- Narcissistic Personality Inventory
- Response format
- Thurstonian item response model
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Social Psychology
- General Psychology