Epideictic And Deliberative Strategies In Opposition To War: The Paradox Of Honor And Expediency

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

This essay examines the dissent of two major congressional opponents of war in the modern age: Senators Robert F. Kennedy and Sam Nunn. It advances the argument that, like presidential discourse advocating military action, congressional dissent can be understood in terms of appeals to honor and expediency. Such a framework elucidates the rhetorical dynamics between presidents and Congress and facilitates an understanding of the continuing rhetorical failure of the congressional branch on issues of war and peace.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)65-78
Number of pages14
JournalCommunication Studies
Volume43
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 1 1992
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

honor
opposition
appeal
peace
president
Military
discourse

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Communication

Cite this

Epideictic And Deliberative Strategies In Opposition To War : The Paradox Of Honor And Expediency. / Murphy, John M.

In: Communication Studies, Vol. 43, No. 2, 01.06.1992, p. 65-78.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{f9187be15eb645a5b2d67431fb3021d0,
title = "Epideictic And Deliberative Strategies In Opposition To War: The Paradox Of Honor And Expediency",
abstract = "This essay examines the dissent of two major congressional opponents of war in the modern age: Senators Robert F. Kennedy and Sam Nunn. It advances the argument that, like presidential discourse advocating military action, congressional dissent can be understood in terms of appeals to honor and expediency. Such a framework elucidates the rhetorical dynamics between presidents and Congress and facilitates an understanding of the continuing rhetorical failure of the congressional branch on issues of war and peace.",
author = "Murphy, {John M}",
year = "1992",
month = "6",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1080/10510979209368361",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "43",
pages = "65--78",
journal = "Communication Studies",
issn = "1051-0974",
publisher = "Central States Communication Association",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Epideictic And Deliberative Strategies In Opposition To War

T2 - The Paradox Of Honor And Expediency

AU - Murphy, John M

PY - 1992/6/1

Y1 - 1992/6/1

N2 - This essay examines the dissent of two major congressional opponents of war in the modern age: Senators Robert F. Kennedy and Sam Nunn. It advances the argument that, like presidential discourse advocating military action, congressional dissent can be understood in terms of appeals to honor and expediency. Such a framework elucidates the rhetorical dynamics between presidents and Congress and facilitates an understanding of the continuing rhetorical failure of the congressional branch on issues of war and peace.

AB - This essay examines the dissent of two major congressional opponents of war in the modern age: Senators Robert F. Kennedy and Sam Nunn. It advances the argument that, like presidential discourse advocating military action, congressional dissent can be understood in terms of appeals to honor and expediency. Such a framework elucidates the rhetorical dynamics between presidents and Congress and facilitates an understanding of the continuing rhetorical failure of the congressional branch on issues of war and peace.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84919770756&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84919770756&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/10510979209368361

DO - 10.1080/10510979209368361

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84919770756

VL - 43

SP - 65

EP - 78

JO - Communication Studies

JF - Communication Studies

SN - 1051-0974

IS - 2

ER -