TY - JOUR
T1 - Environmental DNA as an emerging tool in botanical research
AU - Johnson, Mark D.
AU - Freeland, Joanna R.
AU - Parducci, Laura
AU - Evans, Darren M.
AU - Meyer, Rachel S.
AU - Molano-Flores, Brenda
AU - Davis, Mark A.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2023 The Authors. American Journal of Botany published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of Botanical Society of America.
PY - 2023/2
Y1 - 2023/2
N2 - Over the past quarter century, environmental DNA (eDNA) has been ascendant as a tool to detect, measure, and monitor biodiversity (species and communities), as a means of elucidating biological interaction networks, and as a window into understanding past patterns of biodiversity. However, only recently has the potential of eDNA been realized in the botanical world. Here we synthesize the state of eDNA applications in botanical systems with emphases on aquatic, ancient, contemporary sediment, and airborne systems, and focusing on both single-species approaches and multispecies community metabarcoding. Further, we describe how abiotic and biotic factors, taxonomic resolution, primer choice, spatiotemporal scales, and relative abundance influence the utilization and interpretation of airborne eDNA results. Lastly, we explore several areas and opportunities for further development of eDNA tools for plants, advancing our knowledge and understanding of the efficacy, utility, and cost-effectiveness, and ultimately facilitating increased adoption of eDNA analyses in botanical systems.
AB - Over the past quarter century, environmental DNA (eDNA) has been ascendant as a tool to detect, measure, and monitor biodiversity (species and communities), as a means of elucidating biological interaction networks, and as a window into understanding past patterns of biodiversity. However, only recently has the potential of eDNA been realized in the botanical world. Here we synthesize the state of eDNA applications in botanical systems with emphases on aquatic, ancient, contemporary sediment, and airborne systems, and focusing on both single-species approaches and multispecies community metabarcoding. Further, we describe how abiotic and biotic factors, taxonomic resolution, primer choice, spatiotemporal scales, and relative abundance influence the utilization and interpretation of airborne eDNA results. Lastly, we explore several areas and opportunities for further development of eDNA tools for plants, advancing our knowledge and understanding of the efficacy, utility, and cost-effectiveness, and ultimately facilitating increased adoption of eDNA analyses in botanical systems.
KW - ancient botanical eDNA
KW - aquatic botanical eDNA
KW - botanical eDNA
KW - eDNA
KW - organism derived botanical eDNA
KW - review
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85147531041&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85147531041&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1002/ajb2.16120
DO - 10.1002/ajb2.16120
M3 - Review article
C2 - 36632660
AN - SCOPUS:85147531041
SN - 0002-9122
VL - 110
JO - American journal of botany
JF - American journal of botany
IS - 2
M1 - e16120
ER -