TY - JOUR
T1 - Enhancing agency and empowerment in agricultural development projects
T2 - A synthesis of mixed methods impact evaluations from the Gender, Agriculture, and Assets Project, Phase 2 (GAAP2)
AU - GAAP2 for pro-WEAI Study Team
AU - Quisumbing, Agnes R.
AU - Meinzen-Dick, Ruth
AU - Malapit, Hazel J.
AU - Seymour, Greg
AU - Heckert, Jessica
AU - Doss, Cheryl
AU - Johnson, Nancy
AU - Rubin, Deborah
AU - Thai, Giang
AU - Ramani, Gayathri
AU - Meyers, Emily
AU - Quisumbing, Agnes
AU - Malapit, Hazel
AU - Dione, Malick
AU - Martinez, Elena M.
AU - Pereira, Audrey
AU - van Biljon, Chloe
AU - Vaz, Ana
AU - Elias, Marlène
AU - Mulema, Annet
AU - Myers, Emily
AU - Go, Ara
AU - Argento, Federica
AU - Ahmed, Akhter
AU - Hannan, Anika
AU - Roy, Shalini
AU - Younus, Masuma
AU - Brauw, Alan de
AU - Dey, Amita
AU - Kramer, Berber
AU - Murphy, Mike
AU - Crookston, Benjamin
AU - Gash, Megan
AU - Gray, Bobbi
AU - Benali, Marwan
AU - Schreinemachers, Pepijn
AU - Sobgui, Caroline
AU - Janzen, Sarah
AU - Joshi, Neena
AU - Magnan, Nicholas
AU - Pradhan, Rajendra
AU - Sharma, Sudhindra
AU - Theis, Sophie
AU - Bellemare, Marc
AU - Casier, Bart
AU - James, Susan
AU - Krause, Brooke
AU - Lardinois, Mathias
AU - McCarthy, Aine
AU - Gabrysch, Sabine
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 The Author(s)
PY - 2024/5
Y1 - 2024/5
N2 - Development interventions increasingly include women's empowerment and gender equality among their objectives, but evaluating their impact has been stymied by the lack of measures that are comparable across interventions. This paper synthesizes the findings of 11 mixed-methods impact evaluations of agricultural development projects from South Asia and sub-Saharan Africa that were part of the Gender, Agriculture, and Assets Project, Phase 2 (GAAP2). As part of GAAP2, qualitative and quantitative data were used to develop and validate the multidimensional project-level Women's Empowerment in Agriculture Index (pro-WEAI), which was used to assess the impact of GAAP2 projects on women's empowerment. This paper assesses the extent to which: (1) a two- to three-year agricultural development project can contribute to women's empowerment; and (2) a suite of methods comprising a standardized quantitative measure of women's empowerment and a set of qualitative protocols, can evaluate such impacts. Our synthesis finds that the most common positive significant impacts were on the instrumental and collective agency indicators that comprise pro-WEAI, owing to the group-based approaches used. We found few projects significantly improved intrinsic agency, even among those with explicitly stated objectives to change gender norms. Unsurprisingly, we find mixed, and mostly null impacts on aggregate pro-WEAI, with positive impacts more likely in the South Asian, rather than African, cases. Our results highlight the need for projects to design their strategies specifically for empowerment, rather than assume that projects aiming to reach and benefit women automatically empower them. Our study also shows the value of a suite of methods containing a common metric to compare empowerment impacts and qualitative protocols to understand and contextualize these impacts.
AB - Development interventions increasingly include women's empowerment and gender equality among their objectives, but evaluating their impact has been stymied by the lack of measures that are comparable across interventions. This paper synthesizes the findings of 11 mixed-methods impact evaluations of agricultural development projects from South Asia and sub-Saharan Africa that were part of the Gender, Agriculture, and Assets Project, Phase 2 (GAAP2). As part of GAAP2, qualitative and quantitative data were used to develop and validate the multidimensional project-level Women's Empowerment in Agriculture Index (pro-WEAI), which was used to assess the impact of GAAP2 projects on women's empowerment. This paper assesses the extent to which: (1) a two- to three-year agricultural development project can contribute to women's empowerment; and (2) a suite of methods comprising a standardized quantitative measure of women's empowerment and a set of qualitative protocols, can evaluate such impacts. Our synthesis finds that the most common positive significant impacts were on the instrumental and collective agency indicators that comprise pro-WEAI, owing to the group-based approaches used. We found few projects significantly improved intrinsic agency, even among those with explicitly stated objectives to change gender norms. Unsurprisingly, we find mixed, and mostly null impacts on aggregate pro-WEAI, with positive impacts more likely in the South Asian, rather than African, cases. Our results highlight the need for projects to design their strategies specifically for empowerment, rather than assume that projects aiming to reach and benefit women automatically empower them. Our study also shows the value of a suite of methods containing a common metric to compare empowerment impacts and qualitative protocols to understand and contextualize these impacts.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85194528880&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85194528880&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2024.103295
DO - 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2024.103295
M3 - Article
C2 - 38947195
AN - SCOPUS:85194528880
SN - 0743-0167
VL - 108
JO - Journal of Rural Studies
JF - Journal of Rural Studies
M1 - 103295
ER -