Enhanced rate of intramolecular electron transfer in an engineered purple CuA azurin

Ole Farver, Yi Lu, Majorie C. Ang, Israel Pecht

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

The recent expression of an azurin mutant where the blue type 1 copper site is replaced by the purple Cu(A) site of Paracoccus denitrificans cytochrome c oxidase has yielded an optimal system for examining the unique electron mediation properties of the binuclear Cu(A) center, because both type 1 and Cu(A) centers are placed in the same location in the protein while all other structural elements remain the same. Long-range electron transfer is induced between the disulfide radical anion, produced pulse radiolytically, and the oxidized binuclear Cu(A) center in the purple azurin mutant. The rate constant of this intramolecular process, k(ET) = 650 ± 60 s-1 at 298 K and pH 5.1, is almost 3-fold faster than for the same process in the wild-type single blue copper azurin from Pseudomonas aeruginosa (250 ± 20 s-1), in spite of a smaller driving force (0.69 eV for purple Cu(A) azurin vs. 0.76 eV for blue copper azurin). The reorganization energy of the Cu(A) center is calculated to be 0.4 eV, which is only 50% of that found for the wild-type azurin. These results represent a direct comparison of electron transfer properties of the blue and purple Cu(A) sites in the same protein framework and provide support for the notion that the binuclear purple Cu(A) center is a more efficient electron transfer agent than the blue single copper center because reactivity of the former involves a lower reorganization energy.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)899-902
Number of pages4
JournalProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
Volume96
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 2 1999

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • General

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Enhanced rate of intramolecular electron transfer in an engineered purple CuA azurin'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this