Engaging young students in scientific investigations: Prompting for meaningful reflection

Travis Wilson, Michelle Perry, Carolyn Jane Anderson, Dean Grosshandler

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

This study examined the verbal prompts a tutor used to promote reflection and young students' responses to these prompts. Seven children (ages 8-12) participated in 260 min of one-on-one tutoring to learn scientific concepts related to gear movement; the tutor spontaneously provided these students with 763 prompts for reflection. Prompts reliably induced reflection: Students responded verbally 87% of the time. Turn-by-turn discourse analysis revealed seven distinct types of prompts and 11 distinct types of verbal responses. High-level prompts were strongly associated with high-level responses. A log-multiplicative association model with two dimensions (temporality and certainty) represented the relationships between prompt and response types; from this model, odds ratios estimated the strength of association between specific pairs of prompt and response types. Findings are discussed in terms of the effects that reflection may have on students' developing understanding of scientific concepts.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)19-46
Number of pages28
JournalInstructional Science
Volume40
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2012

Fingerprint

Students
tutor
student
discourse analysis
Odds Ratio
time

Keywords

  • Elementary science
  • Reflection
  • Scientific problem-solving
  • Tutoring

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Education
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology

Cite this

Engaging young students in scientific investigations : Prompting for meaningful reflection. / Wilson, Travis; Perry, Michelle; Anderson, Carolyn Jane; Grosshandler, Dean.

In: Instructional Science, Vol. 40, No. 1, 01.01.2012, p. 19-46.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{540c8b38d8f048cd94984dbc354eac88,
title = "Engaging young students in scientific investigations: Prompting for meaningful reflection",
abstract = "This study examined the verbal prompts a tutor used to promote reflection and young students' responses to these prompts. Seven children (ages 8-12) participated in 260 min of one-on-one tutoring to learn scientific concepts related to gear movement; the tutor spontaneously provided these students with 763 prompts for reflection. Prompts reliably induced reflection: Students responded verbally 87{\%} of the time. Turn-by-turn discourse analysis revealed seven distinct types of prompts and 11 distinct types of verbal responses. High-level prompts were strongly associated with high-level responses. A log-multiplicative association model with two dimensions (temporality and certainty) represented the relationships between prompt and response types; from this model, odds ratios estimated the strength of association between specific pairs of prompt and response types. Findings are discussed in terms of the effects that reflection may have on students' developing understanding of scientific concepts.",
keywords = "Elementary science, Reflection, Scientific problem-solving, Tutoring",
author = "Travis Wilson and Michelle Perry and Anderson, {Carolyn Jane} and Dean Grosshandler",
year = "2012",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/s11251-011-9168-3",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "40",
pages = "19--46",
journal = "Instructional Science",
issn = "0020-4277",
publisher = "Springer Netherlands",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Engaging young students in scientific investigations

T2 - Prompting for meaningful reflection

AU - Wilson, Travis

AU - Perry, Michelle

AU - Anderson, Carolyn Jane

AU - Grosshandler, Dean

PY - 2012/1/1

Y1 - 2012/1/1

N2 - This study examined the verbal prompts a tutor used to promote reflection and young students' responses to these prompts. Seven children (ages 8-12) participated in 260 min of one-on-one tutoring to learn scientific concepts related to gear movement; the tutor spontaneously provided these students with 763 prompts for reflection. Prompts reliably induced reflection: Students responded verbally 87% of the time. Turn-by-turn discourse analysis revealed seven distinct types of prompts and 11 distinct types of verbal responses. High-level prompts were strongly associated with high-level responses. A log-multiplicative association model with two dimensions (temporality and certainty) represented the relationships between prompt and response types; from this model, odds ratios estimated the strength of association between specific pairs of prompt and response types. Findings are discussed in terms of the effects that reflection may have on students' developing understanding of scientific concepts.

AB - This study examined the verbal prompts a tutor used to promote reflection and young students' responses to these prompts. Seven children (ages 8-12) participated in 260 min of one-on-one tutoring to learn scientific concepts related to gear movement; the tutor spontaneously provided these students with 763 prompts for reflection. Prompts reliably induced reflection: Students responded verbally 87% of the time. Turn-by-turn discourse analysis revealed seven distinct types of prompts and 11 distinct types of verbal responses. High-level prompts were strongly associated with high-level responses. A log-multiplicative association model with two dimensions (temporality and certainty) represented the relationships between prompt and response types; from this model, odds ratios estimated the strength of association between specific pairs of prompt and response types. Findings are discussed in terms of the effects that reflection may have on students' developing understanding of scientific concepts.

KW - Elementary science

KW - Reflection

KW - Scientific problem-solving

KW - Tutoring

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=83055194720&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=83055194720&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s11251-011-9168-3

DO - 10.1007/s11251-011-9168-3

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:83055194720

VL - 40

SP - 19

EP - 46

JO - Instructional Science

JF - Instructional Science

SN - 0020-4277

IS - 1

ER -