Employer Costs and Conflicts Under the Affordable Care Act

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Qualified employers must provide health care coverage under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act of 2010 (ACA) or face a fine beginning January 2015. As employers actively attempt to minimize the costs that they will incur, the possibility emerges that employers will retaliate against or harass employees who seek coverage. This Essay discusses the protections for employees under the law and the possible deficiencies in the law. It shows that employers and employees often have contrasting incentives—employers to avoid coverage and employees to take coverage—and these incentives may result in employer harassment and retaliation of employees. Presently, in an analogous context, employees often raise retaliation claims after they have complained of discrimination, and these claims have had significant success. Because of similarities between these situations, comparable retaliation under the ACA is likely, and perhaps it will occur even more due to the significant specific costs that employers face under the ACA.
Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)56-69
Number of pages14
JournalCornell Law Review
Volume99
StatePublished - 2013

Fingerprint

employer
act
employee
retaliation
costs
coverage
Law
discrimination
incentive
health care

Keywords

  • Affordable Care Act
  • Retaliation
  • Restructuring
  • Employment
  • Harassment
  • Costs
  • health care
  • employer
  • Insurance
  • part-time
  • full-time

Cite this

Employer Costs and Conflicts Under the Affordable Care Act. / Thomas, Suja A.

In: Cornell Law Review, Vol. 99, 2013, p. 56-69.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{4b432d0a7fc247c1815cc6a51d2f018b,
title = "Employer Costs and Conflicts Under the Affordable Care Act",
abstract = "Qualified employers must provide health care coverage under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act of 2010 (ACA) or face a fine beginning January 2015. As employers actively attempt to minimize the costs that they will incur, the possibility emerges that employers will retaliate against or harass employees who seek coverage. This Essay discusses the protections for employees under the law and the possible deficiencies in the law. It shows that employers and employees often have contrasting incentives—employers to avoid coverage and employees to take coverage—and these incentives may result in employer harassment and retaliation of employees. Presently, in an analogous context, employees often raise retaliation claims after they have complained of discrimination, and these claims have had significant success. Because of similarities between these situations, comparable retaliation under the ACA is likely, and perhaps it will occur even more due to the significant specific costs that employers face under the ACA.",
keywords = "Affordable Care Act, Retaliation, Restructuring, Employment, Harassment, Costs, health care, employer, Insurance, part-time, full-time",
author = "Thomas, {Suja A}",
year = "2013",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "99",
pages = "56--69",
journal = "Cornell Law Review",
issn = "0010-8847",
publisher = "Cornell Law School",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Employer Costs and Conflicts Under the Affordable Care Act

AU - Thomas, Suja A

PY - 2013

Y1 - 2013

N2 - Qualified employers must provide health care coverage under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act of 2010 (ACA) or face a fine beginning January 2015. As employers actively attempt to minimize the costs that they will incur, the possibility emerges that employers will retaliate against or harass employees who seek coverage. This Essay discusses the protections for employees under the law and the possible deficiencies in the law. It shows that employers and employees often have contrasting incentives—employers to avoid coverage and employees to take coverage—and these incentives may result in employer harassment and retaliation of employees. Presently, in an analogous context, employees often raise retaliation claims after they have complained of discrimination, and these claims have had significant success. Because of similarities between these situations, comparable retaliation under the ACA is likely, and perhaps it will occur even more due to the significant specific costs that employers face under the ACA.

AB - Qualified employers must provide health care coverage under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act of 2010 (ACA) or face a fine beginning January 2015. As employers actively attempt to minimize the costs that they will incur, the possibility emerges that employers will retaliate against or harass employees who seek coverage. This Essay discusses the protections for employees under the law and the possible deficiencies in the law. It shows that employers and employees often have contrasting incentives—employers to avoid coverage and employees to take coverage—and these incentives may result in employer harassment and retaliation of employees. Presently, in an analogous context, employees often raise retaliation claims after they have complained of discrimination, and these claims have had significant success. Because of similarities between these situations, comparable retaliation under the ACA is likely, and perhaps it will occur even more due to the significant specific costs that employers face under the ACA.

KW - Affordable Care Act

KW - Retaliation

KW - Restructuring

KW - Employment

KW - Harassment

KW - Costs

KW - health care

KW - employer

KW - Insurance

KW - part-time

KW - full-time

M3 - Article

VL - 99

SP - 56

EP - 69

JO - Cornell Law Review

JF - Cornell Law Review

SN - 0010-8847

ER -