Employee Self-Representation and the Law in the United States

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Collective representation has been a legal focal point in the United States for nearly a century. Little attention has been paid to the law in the obverse situation: individual self-representation. This essay explores how, on some issues, the law supports a regime of individual bargaining while, on others, is antithetical to it. In other words, US law is incoherent on the matter. By reference to law in Australia and New Zealand, this paper argues that more legal space can be created for employees to represent themselves.
Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)937-964
JournalOsgoode Hall Law Journal
Volume50
Issue number4
StatePublished - 2013

Fingerprint

employee
Law
New Zealand
regime

Keywords

  • Collective Bargaining
  • United States
  • Employee rights

Cite this

Employee Self-Representation and the Law in the United States. / Finkin, Matthew W.

In: Osgoode Hall Law Journal, Vol. 50, No. 4, 2013, p. 937-964.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{e1916c77b08e44b38a38805f6393d604,
title = "Employee Self-Representation and the Law in the United States",
abstract = "Collective representation has been a legal focal point in the United States for nearly a century. Little attention has been paid to the law in the obverse situation: individual self-representation. This essay explores how, on some issues, the law supports a regime of individual bargaining while, on others, is antithetical to it. In other words, US law is incoherent on the matter. By reference to law in Australia and New Zealand, this paper argues that more legal space can be created for employees to represent themselves.",
keywords = "Collective Bargaining, United States, Employee rights",
author = "Finkin, {Matthew W}",
year = "2013",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "50",
pages = "937--964",
journal = "Osgoode Hall Law Journal",
issn = "0030-6185",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Employee Self-Representation and the Law in the United States

AU - Finkin, Matthew W

PY - 2013

Y1 - 2013

N2 - Collective representation has been a legal focal point in the United States for nearly a century. Little attention has been paid to the law in the obverse situation: individual self-representation. This essay explores how, on some issues, the law supports a regime of individual bargaining while, on others, is antithetical to it. In other words, US law is incoherent on the matter. By reference to law in Australia and New Zealand, this paper argues that more legal space can be created for employees to represent themselves.

AB - Collective representation has been a legal focal point in the United States for nearly a century. Little attention has been paid to the law in the obverse situation: individual self-representation. This essay explores how, on some issues, the law supports a regime of individual bargaining while, on others, is antithetical to it. In other words, US law is incoherent on the matter. By reference to law in Australia and New Zealand, this paper argues that more legal space can be created for employees to represent themselves.

KW - Collective Bargaining

KW - United States

KW - Employee rights

M3 - Article

VL - 50

SP - 937

EP - 964

JO - Osgoode Hall Law Journal

JF - Osgoode Hall Law Journal

SN - 0030-6185

IS - 4

ER -