Egg size variation in birds with asynchronous hatching

Is bigger really better?

J. Dylan Maddox, Patrick J Weatherhead

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

In many animals large size at birth enhances offspring survival, but comparative evidence remains equivocal for birds. Failure to consider asynchronous hatching (ASH) may have confounded previous analyses. We assessed effects of egg size and ASH on growth and survival of common grackle (Quiscalus quiscula) nestlings to test the hypothesis that females adjust the size of last-laid eggs to modify effects of ASH. Although positive, the effect of egg size on nestling growth and survival was overwhelmed by the effect of ASH, with late-hatched nestlings being most likely to starve. Egg size did significantly affect growth late in the nestling period, but only because starvation had greatly reduced hatching asynchrony among surviving nestlings. Similarly, in experimentally synchronized nests, egg size and hatching asynchrony both affected offspring growth early in the nestling phase. Our results suggest that there is unlikely to be an adaptive advantage to females from varying the size of last-laid eggs in species with substantial ASH and that studies to assess the effect of a given maternal effect (e.g., varying egg size) should be done in the context of other maternal effects that may be operating simultaneously (e.g., ASH).

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)358-365
Number of pages8
JournalAmerican Naturalist
Volume171
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 1 2008

Fingerprint

egg size
hatching
nestling
bird
birds
Quiscalus quiscula
maternal effect
egg
starvation
nestlings
nest
nests
effect
animal

Keywords

  • Intraclutch egg size variation
  • Maternal effects
  • Nestling growth
  • Nestling starvation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Ecology

Cite this

Egg size variation in birds with asynchronous hatching : Is bigger really better? / Maddox, J. Dylan; Weatherhead, Patrick J.

In: American Naturalist, Vol. 171, No. 3, 01.03.2008, p. 358-365.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{cbad02b5301e457da08d841a1a42ef72,
title = "Egg size variation in birds with asynchronous hatching: Is bigger really better?",
abstract = "In many animals large size at birth enhances offspring survival, but comparative evidence remains equivocal for birds. Failure to consider asynchronous hatching (ASH) may have confounded previous analyses. We assessed effects of egg size and ASH on growth and survival of common grackle (Quiscalus quiscula) nestlings to test the hypothesis that females adjust the size of last-laid eggs to modify effects of ASH. Although positive, the effect of egg size on nestling growth and survival was overwhelmed by the effect of ASH, with late-hatched nestlings being most likely to starve. Egg size did significantly affect growth late in the nestling period, but only because starvation had greatly reduced hatching asynchrony among surviving nestlings. Similarly, in experimentally synchronized nests, egg size and hatching asynchrony both affected offspring growth early in the nestling phase. Our results suggest that there is unlikely to be an adaptive advantage to females from varying the size of last-laid eggs in species with substantial ASH and that studies to assess the effect of a given maternal effect (e.g., varying egg size) should be done in the context of other maternal effects that may be operating simultaneously (e.g., ASH).",
keywords = "Intraclutch egg size variation, Maternal effects, Nestling growth, Nestling starvation",
author = "Maddox, {J. Dylan} and Weatherhead, {Patrick J}",
year = "2008",
month = "3",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1086/527500",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "171",
pages = "358--365",
journal = "American Naturalist",
issn = "0003-0147",
publisher = "University of Chicago",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Egg size variation in birds with asynchronous hatching

T2 - Is bigger really better?

AU - Maddox, J. Dylan

AU - Weatherhead, Patrick J

PY - 2008/3/1

Y1 - 2008/3/1

N2 - In many animals large size at birth enhances offspring survival, but comparative evidence remains equivocal for birds. Failure to consider asynchronous hatching (ASH) may have confounded previous analyses. We assessed effects of egg size and ASH on growth and survival of common grackle (Quiscalus quiscula) nestlings to test the hypothesis that females adjust the size of last-laid eggs to modify effects of ASH. Although positive, the effect of egg size on nestling growth and survival was overwhelmed by the effect of ASH, with late-hatched nestlings being most likely to starve. Egg size did significantly affect growth late in the nestling period, but only because starvation had greatly reduced hatching asynchrony among surviving nestlings. Similarly, in experimentally synchronized nests, egg size and hatching asynchrony both affected offspring growth early in the nestling phase. Our results suggest that there is unlikely to be an adaptive advantage to females from varying the size of last-laid eggs in species with substantial ASH and that studies to assess the effect of a given maternal effect (e.g., varying egg size) should be done in the context of other maternal effects that may be operating simultaneously (e.g., ASH).

AB - In many animals large size at birth enhances offspring survival, but comparative evidence remains equivocal for birds. Failure to consider asynchronous hatching (ASH) may have confounded previous analyses. We assessed effects of egg size and ASH on growth and survival of common grackle (Quiscalus quiscula) nestlings to test the hypothesis that females adjust the size of last-laid eggs to modify effects of ASH. Although positive, the effect of egg size on nestling growth and survival was overwhelmed by the effect of ASH, with late-hatched nestlings being most likely to starve. Egg size did significantly affect growth late in the nestling period, but only because starvation had greatly reduced hatching asynchrony among surviving nestlings. Similarly, in experimentally synchronized nests, egg size and hatching asynchrony both affected offspring growth early in the nestling phase. Our results suggest that there is unlikely to be an adaptive advantage to females from varying the size of last-laid eggs in species with substantial ASH and that studies to assess the effect of a given maternal effect (e.g., varying egg size) should be done in the context of other maternal effects that may be operating simultaneously (e.g., ASH).

KW - Intraclutch egg size variation

KW - Maternal effects

KW - Nestling growth

KW - Nestling starvation

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=40549123989&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=40549123989&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1086/527500

DO - 10.1086/527500

M3 - Article

VL - 171

SP - 358

EP - 365

JO - American Naturalist

JF - American Naturalist

SN - 0003-0147

IS - 3

ER -