Effects of teacher framing on student engagement during collaborative reasoning discussions

Amanda R. Baker, Tzu Jung Lin, Jing Chen, Narmada Paul, Richard C Anderson, Kim Nguyen-Jahiel

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Collaborative argumentation can enhance students’ reasoning, content learning, and interest, but these benefits are contingent upon high levels of student engagement. This study examined the influence of teacher framing strategies that provided autonomy support and structure on students’ engagement during Collaborative Reasoning discussions through the lens of self-determination theory. Transcripts and video recordings of 52 discussions in six fourth-grade classrooms were analyzed for (a) teacher framing strategies used to communicate structure and autonomy support for the upcoming discussion, (b) teacher scaffolding strategies used to enhance thinking and interaction during the discussion, and (c) students’ cognitive-behavioral and social-emotional engagement during the discussion. The findings identified certain teacher framing and teacher scaffolding strategies that had a significant influence on student engagement. Notably, one teacher framing strategy, collaborative rule-setting, predicted higher cognitive-behavioral and social-emotional engagement after controlling for the effects of teacher scaffolding during the discussions. The evidence suggests that providing task structure in autonomy-supportive ways can enhance student engagement during collaborative argumentation.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)253-266
Number of pages14
JournalContemporary Educational Psychology
Volume51
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 2017

Fingerprint

Students
teacher
student
autonomy
argumentation
Video Recording
Personal Autonomy
video recording
Lenses
self-determination
Learning
classroom
interaction
learning
evidence

Keywords

  • Autonomy support
  • Collaborative argumentation
  • Engagement
  • Small-group discussion
  • Structure

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Education
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology

Cite this

Effects of teacher framing on student engagement during collaborative reasoning discussions. / Baker, Amanda R.; Lin, Tzu Jung; Chen, Jing; Paul, Narmada; Anderson, Richard C; Nguyen-Jahiel, Kim.

In: Contemporary Educational Psychology, Vol. 51, 10.2017, p. 253-266.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Baker, Amanda R. ; Lin, Tzu Jung ; Chen, Jing ; Paul, Narmada ; Anderson, Richard C ; Nguyen-Jahiel, Kim. / Effects of teacher framing on student engagement during collaborative reasoning discussions. In: Contemporary Educational Psychology. 2017 ; Vol. 51. pp. 253-266.
@article{b4bb8c7a8e11458888d51338239b9029,
title = "Effects of teacher framing on student engagement during collaborative reasoning discussions",
abstract = "Collaborative argumentation can enhance students’ reasoning, content learning, and interest, but these benefits are contingent upon high levels of student engagement. This study examined the influence of teacher framing strategies that provided autonomy support and structure on students’ engagement during Collaborative Reasoning discussions through the lens of self-determination theory. Transcripts and video recordings of 52 discussions in six fourth-grade classrooms were analyzed for (a) teacher framing strategies used to communicate structure and autonomy support for the upcoming discussion, (b) teacher scaffolding strategies used to enhance thinking and interaction during the discussion, and (c) students’ cognitive-behavioral and social-emotional engagement during the discussion. The findings identified certain teacher framing and teacher scaffolding strategies that had a significant influence on student engagement. Notably, one teacher framing strategy, collaborative rule-setting, predicted higher cognitive-behavioral and social-emotional engagement after controlling for the effects of teacher scaffolding during the discussions. The evidence suggests that providing task structure in autonomy-supportive ways can enhance student engagement during collaborative argumentation.",
keywords = "Autonomy support, Collaborative argumentation, Engagement, Small-group discussion, Structure",
author = "Baker, {Amanda R.} and Lin, {Tzu Jung} and Jing Chen and Narmada Paul and Anderson, {Richard C} and Kim Nguyen-Jahiel",
year = "2017",
month = "10",
doi = "10.1016/j.cedpsych.2017.08.007",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "51",
pages = "253--266",
journal = "Contemporary Educational Psychology",
issn = "0361-476X",
publisher = "Academic Press Inc.",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Effects of teacher framing on student engagement during collaborative reasoning discussions

AU - Baker, Amanda R.

AU - Lin, Tzu Jung

AU - Chen, Jing

AU - Paul, Narmada

AU - Anderson, Richard C

AU - Nguyen-Jahiel, Kim

PY - 2017/10

Y1 - 2017/10

N2 - Collaborative argumentation can enhance students’ reasoning, content learning, and interest, but these benefits are contingent upon high levels of student engagement. This study examined the influence of teacher framing strategies that provided autonomy support and structure on students’ engagement during Collaborative Reasoning discussions through the lens of self-determination theory. Transcripts and video recordings of 52 discussions in six fourth-grade classrooms were analyzed for (a) teacher framing strategies used to communicate structure and autonomy support for the upcoming discussion, (b) teacher scaffolding strategies used to enhance thinking and interaction during the discussion, and (c) students’ cognitive-behavioral and social-emotional engagement during the discussion. The findings identified certain teacher framing and teacher scaffolding strategies that had a significant influence on student engagement. Notably, one teacher framing strategy, collaborative rule-setting, predicted higher cognitive-behavioral and social-emotional engagement after controlling for the effects of teacher scaffolding during the discussions. The evidence suggests that providing task structure in autonomy-supportive ways can enhance student engagement during collaborative argumentation.

AB - Collaborative argumentation can enhance students’ reasoning, content learning, and interest, but these benefits are contingent upon high levels of student engagement. This study examined the influence of teacher framing strategies that provided autonomy support and structure on students’ engagement during Collaborative Reasoning discussions through the lens of self-determination theory. Transcripts and video recordings of 52 discussions in six fourth-grade classrooms were analyzed for (a) teacher framing strategies used to communicate structure and autonomy support for the upcoming discussion, (b) teacher scaffolding strategies used to enhance thinking and interaction during the discussion, and (c) students’ cognitive-behavioral and social-emotional engagement during the discussion. The findings identified certain teacher framing and teacher scaffolding strategies that had a significant influence on student engagement. Notably, one teacher framing strategy, collaborative rule-setting, predicted higher cognitive-behavioral and social-emotional engagement after controlling for the effects of teacher scaffolding during the discussions. The evidence suggests that providing task structure in autonomy-supportive ways can enhance student engagement during collaborative argumentation.

KW - Autonomy support

KW - Collaborative argumentation

KW - Engagement

KW - Small-group discussion

KW - Structure

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85028501073&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85028501073&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.cedpsych.2017.08.007

DO - 10.1016/j.cedpsych.2017.08.007

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85028501073

VL - 51

SP - 253

EP - 266

JO - Contemporary Educational Psychology

JF - Contemporary Educational Psychology

SN - 0361-476X

ER -