Effects of rumen-protected methionine on lactation performance and physiological variables during a heat stress challenge in lactating Holstein cows

Milk yield, content, and composition are altered by heat stress. Thirty-two multiparous, lactating Holstein cows [balanced by days in milk (mean ± standard deviation; 184 ± 59); body surface area (5.84 ± 0.34 m²)] were randomly assigned to 1 of 2 dietary treatments [total mixed ration with rumen-protected Met (RPM; Smartamine M; Adisseo Inc., Antony, France; 1.05 g of RPM/kg of dry matter intake) or total mixed ration without RPM (CON)], and within each dietary treatment group cows were randomly assigned to 1 of 2 environmental treatment groups in a split-plot crossover design. The study was divided into 2 periods with 2 phases per period. In phase 1 (9 d), all cows were in thermoneutral conditions and fed ad libitum. In phase 2 (9 d), group 1 (n = 16) was exposed to a heat stress challenge (HSC) using electric heat blankets. Group 2 (n = 16) remained in thermoneutral conditions but was pair-fed (PFTN) to HSC counterparts. After a 21-d washout period, the study was repeated (period 2) and the environmental treatments were inverted relative to treatments from phase 2 of period 1, whereas dietary treatments (RPM or CON) remained the same for each cow. Cows were milked 3× per day and samples were taken on d 1, 5, and 9 of each phase. Vaginal temperature was measured every 10 min, rectal temperature and skin temperature were measured 3× per day, and respiration rate and heart rate were recorded once per day. Cow activity was measured using an accelerometer. Paired difference values were calculated for each cow for each period based on the difference between phase 1 baseline means and phase 2 values for each variable. Cows in HSC had a greater increase in vaginal temperature and respiration rate (+0.2°C and +13.7 breaths/min, respectively) compared with cows in PFTN (0.0°C and −1.6 breaths/min, respectively). Cows in PFTN had a greater decrease in dry matter intake and milk yield (−3.9 and −2.6 kg/d, respectively) compared with cows in HSC (−3.2 and −0.9 kg/d, respectively). Cows in CON had a greater decrease in milk protein concentration for PFTN (−0.10 percentage units) and HSC (−0.06 percentage units) compared with cows in RPM for PFTN (0.00 percentage units) and HSC (−0.02 percentage units). Cows in CON for HSC had greater decrease in milk fat concentration compared with cows in RPM for HSC (−0.10 and +0.12 percentage units, respectively). In conclusion, HSC altered physiological and production parameters of cows. Additionally, RPM helped maintain milk protein and fat concentration during HSC, whereas dry matter intake, milk yield, and feed efficiencies were not affected by RPM.