Effects of room ozonation on air quality and pig performance

A. M. Elenbaas-Thomas, L. Y. Zhao, Y. Hyun, X. Wang, B. Anderson, G. L. Riskowski, M. Ellis, A. J. Heber

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Reducing odor emissions from swine farms to avoid complaints about odor nuisance is a major issue. Ozonation has been used to reduce odor in swine buildings, but little research exists on its benefits. A swine-finishing building was divided into two identical rooms and two treatments, ozonation and the control, were applied in a cross-over design. The treatments were switched between rooms every three weeks. The overall experimental period was 12 weeks, during which there were four trials. Pig growth performance, dust mass and size concentration, odor intensity, total sulfur compounds, hydrogen sulfide concentration, ammonia concentration, and total heterotrophic bacterial counts were measured and analyzed during the test period. Sulfur-containing compounds detected included dimethyldisulfide, dimethyl sulfide (methanethiol), and dimethyltrisulfide. Ozone application to a swine building at the maximum safe concentration of 0.1 ppm did not have any statistically significant effects on dust mass concentration, odor concentration and emission rate, sulfur compound concentrations, and bacteria counts. However, it did increase ammonia concentration and decrease pig average daily gain. The ozonation effects on hydrogen sulfide concentration could not be evaluated by the gas tube method used during this study.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1167-1173
Number of pages7
JournalTransactions of the American Society of Agricultural Engineers
Volume48
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - May 2005

Keywords

  • Bacteria
  • Dust emission
  • Gas emission
  • Odor concentration
  • Particulate matter
  • Pig growth

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Agricultural and Biological Sciences (miscellaneous)

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Effects of room ozonation on air quality and pig performance'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this