Abstract
Surveys of a general population have been a mainstay of leisure and recreation research methods. This study assesses the impact of two different pre-incentives on eliciting a survey response. Two counties with large federal prairie restoration projects and active municipal and county park districts were the study sites. Results show that residents whose pre-incentive was two $1 bills had a significantly higher response rate than residents with a pre-incentive of one $2 bill. With park operations being responsive to needs and preferences of residents, the most accu-rate representation of the general population of constituents is an important goal in any research effort. Given that pre-incentives have become a standard and size-able portion of a survey’s budget, maximizing the effectiveness of the pre-incentive investment is a small, yet critical, part of connecting research to practice.
Original language | English (US) |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 1-10 |
Number of pages | 10 |
Journal | Journal of Park and Recreation Administration |
Volume | 39 |
Issue number | 4 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - Nov 1 2021 |
Keywords
- Financial incentive
- Methods
- Non-response bias
- Pre-incentive
- Survey research
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Nature and Landscape Conservation
- Tourism, Leisure and Hospitality Management
- Urban Studies
- Social Sciences (miscellaneous)