Abstract
Ptilochronology, the study of feather growth bars, has been used to assess nutritional condition, yet the implementation of this technique can be challenging. This study investigated how a magnification aid and level of experience with the technique affected the variability and accuracy of ptilochronology measurements. The average width of growth bars was significantly narrower when made with a magnifying visor as opposed to the unaided eye, suggesting that future ptilochronology studies should incorporate magnification. Measurements were also influenced by the measurer's level of experience, suggesting that a learning curve must be taken into account when analyzing ptilochronology results.
Original language | English (US) |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 319-322 |
Number of pages | 4 |
Journal | Journal of Ornithology |
Volume | 155 |
Issue number | 1 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - Jan 2014 |
Keywords
- Experience level
- House Sparrow
- Magnification
- Ptilochronology
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Animal Science and Zoology