TY - JOUR
T1 - Effects of an approaching group discussion on product responses
AU - Schlosser, Ann
AU - Shavitt, Sharon
N1 - Funding Information:
We thank Michelle Nelson, Chris Riegel, Aimee Hansen, Siamak Bonshahi, Winnie Au, Brad Belden, and Rebecca Perez for their input and for their assistance in data collection and coding, and Janas Sinclair; the University of Illinois Social Cognition Group; and Social, Organizational, and Individual Differences Seminar Group for their valuable input on this research. We are also grateful to the James Webb Young Fund of the Department of Advertising at the University of Illinois for support of this research.
Copyright:
Copyright 2017 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
PY - 1999
Y1 - 1999
N2 - Three experiments were conducted to assess how an approaching group discussion influences consumers' product thoughts. It was proposed that, in preparation for discussion, people cognitively rehearse product thoughts that appear appropriate for discussion. In each study, participants read a restaurant review and then anticipated either discussing the restaurant in a focus group or responding individually. Across the studies, various cues were manipulated regarding the type of information appropriate for discussion (utilitarian vs. social image information). Compared to those in the individual condition, those anticipating a group discussion were more responsive to appropriateness cues: Their listed thoughts were more consistent with the cue than those in the individual condition. Yet, the group-anticipation effect did not influence product judgments regarding the restaurant. These findings suggest that an approaching discussion causes people to tailor their responses in a strategic manner, as a mental rehearsal for the upcoming discussion, without altering their personal views about the product. A third experiment demonstrated that this group-anticipation effect on listed thoughts carried over to the information shared and the product concerns expressed during discussion, suggesting that responses in actual discussion reflected what people had rehearsed in anticipation of discussion.
AB - Three experiments were conducted to assess how an approaching group discussion influences consumers' product thoughts. It was proposed that, in preparation for discussion, people cognitively rehearse product thoughts that appear appropriate for discussion. In each study, participants read a restaurant review and then anticipated either discussing the restaurant in a focus group or responding individually. Across the studies, various cues were manipulated regarding the type of information appropriate for discussion (utilitarian vs. social image information). Compared to those in the individual condition, those anticipating a group discussion were more responsive to appropriateness cues: Their listed thoughts were more consistent with the cue than those in the individual condition. Yet, the group-anticipation effect did not influence product judgments regarding the restaurant. These findings suggest that an approaching discussion causes people to tailor their responses in a strategic manner, as a mental rehearsal for the upcoming discussion, without altering their personal views about the product. A third experiment demonstrated that this group-anticipation effect on listed thoughts carried over to the information shared and the product concerns expressed during discussion, suggesting that responses in actual discussion reflected what people had rehearsed in anticipation of discussion.
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/22844455468
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/22844455468#tab=citedBy
U2 - 10.1207/s15327663jcp0804_02
DO - 10.1207/s15327663jcp0804_02
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:22844455468
SN - 1057-7408
VL - 8
SP - 377
EP - 406
JO - Journal of Consumer Psychology
JF - Journal of Consumer Psychology
IS - 4
ER -