Effectiveness of rehabilitation on seismic behavior of masonry piers

Daniel Abrams, Tracy Smith, Jaret Lynch, Shaun Franklin

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

This paper summarizes research done to evaluate the effect of axial compression on unreinforced brick masonry (URM) walls and various rehabilitation techniques for enhancing seismic performance of URM structures. Flexural behavior of slender piers subjected to repeated and reversed in-plane deflections, and varied axial compression, is summarized relative to FEMA 356. The effectiveness of four rehabilitation techniques for improving seismic resistance are examined: (1) adhered fiber-reinforced polymer strips; (2) reinforced shotcrete overlay; (3) ferrocement surface coating; and (4) grouted reinforcing bars within drilled cores. The effectiveness of each technique is judged relative to the lateral strength and ductility of control piers with no rehabilitation, which are governed by a nonlinear, elastic rocking mode of behavior. Experimental results suggest that rocking behavior may be equal to, or superior to that of retrofitted piers because of the large ductility capacity at the component level. Test results also indicate that the FEMA 356 document conservatively characterizes seismic capacity for both nonrehabilitated and rehabilitated unreinforced masonry piers.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)32-43
Number of pages12
JournalJournal of Structural Engineering
Volume133
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 2 2007

Keywords

  • Bricks
  • Earthquake engineering
  • Earthquake resistant structures
  • Flexural strength
  • Masonry
  • Retrofitting
  • Shear walls
  • Structural response

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Civil and Structural Engineering
  • Building and Construction
  • Materials Science(all)
  • Mechanics of Materials
  • Mechanical Engineering

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Effectiveness of rehabilitation on seismic behavior of masonry piers'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this