TY - JOUR
T1 - Effect of urine contamination on stallion semen freezing ability
AU - Ellerbrock, R. E.
AU - Honorato, J.
AU - Curcio, B. R.
AU - Stewart, J. L.
AU - Souza, J. A.T.
AU - Love, C. C.
AU - Lima, F. S.
AU - Canisso, I. F.
N1 - The American Quarter Horse Foundation is acknowledged for funding this study. The authors are grateful for the assistance of Kristen Massey. Nidacon, Sweden, kindly donated the EquiPure. We are grateful to the different stallion owners for enrolling their stallions in this study. Excerpts of this study were orally presented during the annual convention of the American Association of Equine Practitioners, San Antonio, Texas, November 2017.
PY - 2018/9/1
Y1 - 2018/9/1
N2 - Urospermia is a common ejaculatory dysfunction of stallions. Current practice suggests that urine contaminated semen should not be used for cryopreservation. The aim of this study was to determine effects of urine contamination on semen freezing. Sixty-five ejaculates from eight stallions were divided into no urine (CONT), low (20% urine, LOW), and high (50% urine, HIGH) samples. Semen was extended with a commercial cooling extender, cushion-centrifuged, resuspended to 200 million/mL in a commercial egg-yolk based extender, and cryopreserved in liquid nitrogen. A subset of ejaculates (n = 20) were split in two after cushion-centrifugation, and one half of the ejaculate was submitted to a single-layer gradient centrifugation before cryopreservation. Sperm motility parameters were assessed pre- and post-freezing with an automated sperm analyzer. Semen pH, creatinine, and urea concentrations were assessed in raw samples, after urine contamination and after centrifugation and extension. Statistical analyses were performed with ANOVA and Tukey's posthoc. There were significant reductions in total and progressive sperm motilities (i.e., %TM and %PM, respectively) with increasing urine contamination pre-freezing (%TM 67 ± 1.7, %PM 50 ± 2.2, CONT), (%TM 60.3 ± 1.7, % PM 42.5 ± 2.1, LOW), and (%TM 41.3 ± 2, %PM 21.3 ± 1.5, HIGH). Post-thaw motilities for CONT (%TM 54 ± 2.3, %PM 40.8 ± 3.3) and LOW (%TM 51.7 ± 1.8, %PM 36.2 ± 2.1) were not different, but were higher than the HIGH (%TM 31.5 ± 1.2, %PM 17.1 ± 1.0) (p < 0.05). Post-thaw sperm viability was significantly lower in the HIGH (54.7 ± 2.4) than in the CONT (63.8 ± 2.3) or LOW (64.6 ± 3.4) groups. Semen creatinine and urine levels were significantly higher with increasing urine contamination and were significantly decreased after centrifugation and resuspension in freezing extender. Pre-treatment semen pH was significantly lower than semen contaminated with low or high amounts of urine, and pH decreased significantly after centrifugation and resuspension. Gradient centrifugation did not improve %TM in the control group, but it did improve pre-freeze %TM and %PM in the low and high groups and improved significantly post freezing %TM and %PM in the high urine contaminated group. Semen contaminated with a small amount of urine may be suitable for freezing, whereas highly contaminated semen might not be usable. Although urine was mostly removed in this fashion, the initial exposure to high quantities was sufficient to decrease sperm motility pre- and post-freezing, whereas low urine contamination was not as detrimental.
AB - Urospermia is a common ejaculatory dysfunction of stallions. Current practice suggests that urine contaminated semen should not be used for cryopreservation. The aim of this study was to determine effects of urine contamination on semen freezing. Sixty-five ejaculates from eight stallions were divided into no urine (CONT), low (20% urine, LOW), and high (50% urine, HIGH) samples. Semen was extended with a commercial cooling extender, cushion-centrifuged, resuspended to 200 million/mL in a commercial egg-yolk based extender, and cryopreserved in liquid nitrogen. A subset of ejaculates (n = 20) were split in two after cushion-centrifugation, and one half of the ejaculate was submitted to a single-layer gradient centrifugation before cryopreservation. Sperm motility parameters were assessed pre- and post-freezing with an automated sperm analyzer. Semen pH, creatinine, and urea concentrations were assessed in raw samples, after urine contamination and after centrifugation and extension. Statistical analyses were performed with ANOVA and Tukey's posthoc. There were significant reductions in total and progressive sperm motilities (i.e., %TM and %PM, respectively) with increasing urine contamination pre-freezing (%TM 67 ± 1.7, %PM 50 ± 2.2, CONT), (%TM 60.3 ± 1.7, % PM 42.5 ± 2.1, LOW), and (%TM 41.3 ± 2, %PM 21.3 ± 1.5, HIGH). Post-thaw motilities for CONT (%TM 54 ± 2.3, %PM 40.8 ± 3.3) and LOW (%TM 51.7 ± 1.8, %PM 36.2 ± 2.1) were not different, but were higher than the HIGH (%TM 31.5 ± 1.2, %PM 17.1 ± 1.0) (p < 0.05). Post-thaw sperm viability was significantly lower in the HIGH (54.7 ± 2.4) than in the CONT (63.8 ± 2.3) or LOW (64.6 ± 3.4) groups. Semen creatinine and urine levels were significantly higher with increasing urine contamination and were significantly decreased after centrifugation and resuspension in freezing extender. Pre-treatment semen pH was significantly lower than semen contaminated with low or high amounts of urine, and pH decreased significantly after centrifugation and resuspension. Gradient centrifugation did not improve %TM in the control group, but it did improve pre-freeze %TM and %PM in the low and high groups and improved significantly post freezing %TM and %PM in the high urine contaminated group. Semen contaminated with a small amount of urine may be suitable for freezing, whereas highly contaminated semen might not be usable. Although urine was mostly removed in this fashion, the initial exposure to high quantities was sufficient to decrease sperm motility pre- and post-freezing, whereas low urine contamination was not as detrimental.
KW - Horses
KW - Semen cryopreservation
KW - Sperm parameters
KW - Urospermia
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85048190908&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85048190908&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2018.05.010
DO - 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2018.05.010
M3 - Article
C2 - 29800826
AN - SCOPUS:85048190908
SN - 0093-691X
VL - 117
SP - 1
EP - 6
JO - Theriogenology
JF - Theriogenology
ER -