TY - JOUR
T1 - Effect of geologic depositional environment on CO2 storage efficiency
AU - Okwen, Roland
AU - Yang, Fang
AU - Frailey, Scott
N1 - Funding Information:
This project (DE-FE0009612) is funded by the U.S. Department of Energy through the National Energy Technology Laboratory (NETL). Through a university grant program, Landmark Software (Nexus) was used for the reservoir and geologic modeling. As part of the university grant program, we acknowledge IHS for use of their Petra software.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2014 The Authors Published by Elsevier Ltd.
PY - 2014
Y1 - 2014
N2 - The storage potential and movement of fluids within a formation is dependent on hydraulic characterization unique to each depositional environment. Storage efficiency (E), the ratio of the injected volume of CO2 to the accessible pore volume, quantifies the CO2 storage capacity in a geologic depositional environment, providing a means to assess the CO2 storage resource of candidate reservoirs. This paper quantifies the ranges for E via numerical modeling for eight depositional environments: deltaic, shelf clastic, shelf carbonate, fluvial deltaic, strandplain, reef, fluvial and alluvial, and turbidite. An important aspect of this work is the development of geologic and geocellular modeling that reflects the uniqueness of each depositional environment. Depositional environments were interpreted from core and geophysical log data; geologic and petrophysical data from oil fields and gas storage sites were used as constraints in the development of geocellular models, which were upscaled for flow simulations. Evaluation of the effects of geologic structures on storage efficiency indicates it causes a net increase in efficiency. Fluvial deltaic had the highest E and shelf carbonate had the lowest.
AB - The storage potential and movement of fluids within a formation is dependent on hydraulic characterization unique to each depositional environment. Storage efficiency (E), the ratio of the injected volume of CO2 to the accessible pore volume, quantifies the CO2 storage capacity in a geologic depositional environment, providing a means to assess the CO2 storage resource of candidate reservoirs. This paper quantifies the ranges for E via numerical modeling for eight depositional environments: deltaic, shelf clastic, shelf carbonate, fluvial deltaic, strandplain, reef, fluvial and alluvial, and turbidite. An important aspect of this work is the development of geologic and geocellular modeling that reflects the uniqueness of each depositional environment. Depositional environments were interpreted from core and geophysical log data; geologic and petrophysical data from oil fields and gas storage sites were used as constraints in the development of geocellular models, which were upscaled for flow simulations. Evaluation of the effects of geologic structures on storage efficiency indicates it causes a net increase in efficiency. Fluvial deltaic had the highest E and shelf carbonate had the lowest.
KW - Depositional environment
KW - Formations
KW - Storage efficiency
KW - Structure relief
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84922902137&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84922902137&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.egypro.2014.11.556
DO - 10.1016/j.egypro.2014.11.556
M3 - Conference article
AN - SCOPUS:84922902137
SN - 1876-6102
VL - 63
SP - 5247
EP - 5257
JO - Energy Procedia
JF - Energy Procedia
T2 - 12th International Conference on Greenhouse Gas Control Technologies, GHGT 2014
Y2 - 5 October 2014 through 9 October 2014
ER -