Effect of geologic depositional environment on CO 2 storage efficiency

Research output: Contribution to journalConference article

Abstract

The storage potential and movement of fluids within a formation is dependent on hydraulic characterization unique to each depositional environment. Storage efficiency (E), the ratio of the injected volume of CO 2 to the accessible pore volume, quantifies the CO 2 storage capacity in a geologic depositional environment, providing a means to assess the CO 2 storage resource of candidate reservoirs. This paper quantifies the ranges for E via numerical modeling for eight depositional environments: deltaic, shelf clastic, shelf carbonate, fluvial deltaic, strandplain, reef, fluvial and alluvial, and turbidite. An important aspect of this work is the development of geologic and geocellular modeling that reflects the uniqueness of each depositional environment. Depositional environments were interpreted from core and geophysical log data; geologic and petrophysical data from oil fields and gas storage sites were used as constraints in the development of geocellular models, which were upscaled for flow simulations. Evaluation of the effects of geologic structures on storage efficiency indicates it causes a net increase in efficiency. Fluvial deltaic had the highest E and shelf carbonate had the lowest.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)5247-5257
Number of pages11
JournalEnergy Procedia
Volume63
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2014
Event12th International Conference on Greenhouse Gas Control Technologies, GHGT 2014 - Austin, United States
Duration: Oct 5 2014Oct 9 2014

Fingerprint

Carbonates
Reefs
Flow simulation
Oil fields
Hydraulics
Fluids

Keywords

  • Depositional environment
  • Formations
  • Storage efficiency
  • Structure relief

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Energy(all)

Cite this

Effect of geologic depositional environment on CO 2 storage efficiency . / Okwen, Roland T; Yang, Fang; Frailey, Scott M.

In: Energy Procedia, Vol. 63, 01.01.2014, p. 5247-5257.

Research output: Contribution to journalConference article

@article{346fb988dff84f34b1fd8143d5c7f12e,
title = "Effect of geologic depositional environment on CO 2 storage efficiency",
abstract = "The storage potential and movement of fluids within a formation is dependent on hydraulic characterization unique to each depositional environment. Storage efficiency (E), the ratio of the injected volume of CO 2 to the accessible pore volume, quantifies the CO 2 storage capacity in a geologic depositional environment, providing a means to assess the CO 2 storage resource of candidate reservoirs. This paper quantifies the ranges for E via numerical modeling for eight depositional environments: deltaic, shelf clastic, shelf carbonate, fluvial deltaic, strandplain, reef, fluvial and alluvial, and turbidite. An important aspect of this work is the development of geologic and geocellular modeling that reflects the uniqueness of each depositional environment. Depositional environments were interpreted from core and geophysical log data; geologic and petrophysical data from oil fields and gas storage sites were used as constraints in the development of geocellular models, which were upscaled for flow simulations. Evaluation of the effects of geologic structures on storage efficiency indicates it causes a net increase in efficiency. Fluvial deltaic had the highest E and shelf carbonate had the lowest.",
keywords = "Depositional environment, Formations, Storage efficiency, Structure relief",
author = "Okwen, {Roland T} and Fang Yang and Frailey, {Scott M}",
year = "2014",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.egypro.2014.11.556",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "63",
pages = "5247--5257",
journal = "Energy Procedia",
issn = "1876-6102",
publisher = "Elsevier BV",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Effect of geologic depositional environment on CO 2 storage efficiency

AU - Okwen, Roland T

AU - Yang, Fang

AU - Frailey, Scott M

PY - 2014/1/1

Y1 - 2014/1/1

N2 - The storage potential and movement of fluids within a formation is dependent on hydraulic characterization unique to each depositional environment. Storage efficiency (E), the ratio of the injected volume of CO 2 to the accessible pore volume, quantifies the CO 2 storage capacity in a geologic depositional environment, providing a means to assess the CO 2 storage resource of candidate reservoirs. This paper quantifies the ranges for E via numerical modeling for eight depositional environments: deltaic, shelf clastic, shelf carbonate, fluvial deltaic, strandplain, reef, fluvial and alluvial, and turbidite. An important aspect of this work is the development of geologic and geocellular modeling that reflects the uniqueness of each depositional environment. Depositional environments were interpreted from core and geophysical log data; geologic and petrophysical data from oil fields and gas storage sites were used as constraints in the development of geocellular models, which were upscaled for flow simulations. Evaluation of the effects of geologic structures on storage efficiency indicates it causes a net increase in efficiency. Fluvial deltaic had the highest E and shelf carbonate had the lowest.

AB - The storage potential and movement of fluids within a formation is dependent on hydraulic characterization unique to each depositional environment. Storage efficiency (E), the ratio of the injected volume of CO 2 to the accessible pore volume, quantifies the CO 2 storage capacity in a geologic depositional environment, providing a means to assess the CO 2 storage resource of candidate reservoirs. This paper quantifies the ranges for E via numerical modeling for eight depositional environments: deltaic, shelf clastic, shelf carbonate, fluvial deltaic, strandplain, reef, fluvial and alluvial, and turbidite. An important aspect of this work is the development of geologic and geocellular modeling that reflects the uniqueness of each depositional environment. Depositional environments were interpreted from core and geophysical log data; geologic and petrophysical data from oil fields and gas storage sites were used as constraints in the development of geocellular models, which were upscaled for flow simulations. Evaluation of the effects of geologic structures on storage efficiency indicates it causes a net increase in efficiency. Fluvial deltaic had the highest E and shelf carbonate had the lowest.

KW - Depositional environment

KW - Formations

KW - Storage efficiency

KW - Structure relief

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84922902137&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84922902137&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.egypro.2014.11.556

DO - 10.1016/j.egypro.2014.11.556

M3 - Conference article

AN - SCOPUS:84922902137

VL - 63

SP - 5247

EP - 5257

JO - Energy Procedia

JF - Energy Procedia

SN - 1876-6102

ER -