TY - JOUR
T1 - Effect of deep injection on field-scale emissions of 1,3-dichloropropene and chloropicrin from bare soil
AU - Yates, S. R.
AU - Ashworth, D. J.
AU - Zheng, W.
AU - Knuteson, J.
AU - Van Wesenbeeck, I. J.
N1 - Funding Information:
The use of trade, firm, or corporation names in this research article is for the information and convenience of the reader. Such use does not constitute an official endorsement or approval by the United States Department of Agriculture or the Agricultural Research Service of any product or service to the exclusion of others that may be suitable. The authors are grateful to Q. Zhang and J. Jobes for their assistance in preparing and conducting this experiment. Part of the research described was supported by California Air Resources Board (agreement # 05-351 ).
Publisher Copyright:
© 2016 Published by Elsevier Ltd.
PY - 2016/7/1
Y1 - 2016/7/1
N2 - Fumigating soil is important for the production of many high-value vegetable, fruit, and tree crops, but fumigants are toxic pesticides with relatively high volatility, which can lead to significant atmospheric emissions. A field experiment was conducted to measure emissions and subsurface diffusion of a mixture of 1,3-dichloropropene (1,3-D) and chloropicrin after shank injection to bare soil at 61 cm depth (i.e., deep injection). Three on-field methods, the aerodynamic (ADM), integrated horizontal flux (IHF), and theoretical profile shape (TPS) methods, were used to obtain fumigant flux density and cumulative emission values. Two air dispersion models (CALPUFF and ISCST3) were also used to back-calculate the flux density using air concentration measurements surrounding the fumigated field. Emissions were continuously measured for 16 days and the daily peak emission rates for the five methods ranged from 13 to 33 μg m-2 s-1 for 1,3-D and 0.22-3.2 μg m-2 s-1 for chloropicrin. Total 1,3-D mass lost to the atmosphere was approximately 23-41 kg ha-1, or 15-27% of the applied active ingredient and total mass loss of chloropicrin was <2%. Based on the five methods, deep injection reduced total emissions by approximately 2-24% compared to standard fumigation practices where fumigant injection is at 46 cm depth. Given the relatively wide range in emission-reduction percentages, a fumigant diffusion model was used to predict the percentage reduction in emissions by injecting at 61 cm, which yielded a 21% reduction in emissions. Significant reductions in emissions of 1,3-D and chloropicrin are possible by injecting soil fumigants deeper in soil.
AB - Fumigating soil is important for the production of many high-value vegetable, fruit, and tree crops, but fumigants are toxic pesticides with relatively high volatility, which can lead to significant atmospheric emissions. A field experiment was conducted to measure emissions and subsurface diffusion of a mixture of 1,3-dichloropropene (1,3-D) and chloropicrin after shank injection to bare soil at 61 cm depth (i.e., deep injection). Three on-field methods, the aerodynamic (ADM), integrated horizontal flux (IHF), and theoretical profile shape (TPS) methods, were used to obtain fumigant flux density and cumulative emission values. Two air dispersion models (CALPUFF and ISCST3) were also used to back-calculate the flux density using air concentration measurements surrounding the fumigated field. Emissions were continuously measured for 16 days and the daily peak emission rates for the five methods ranged from 13 to 33 μg m-2 s-1 for 1,3-D and 0.22-3.2 μg m-2 s-1 for chloropicrin. Total 1,3-D mass lost to the atmosphere was approximately 23-41 kg ha-1, or 15-27% of the applied active ingredient and total mass loss of chloropicrin was <2%. Based on the five methods, deep injection reduced total emissions by approximately 2-24% compared to standard fumigation practices where fumigant injection is at 46 cm depth. Given the relatively wide range in emission-reduction percentages, a fumigant diffusion model was used to predict the percentage reduction in emissions by injecting at 61 cm, which yielded a 21% reduction in emissions. Significant reductions in emissions of 1,3-D and chloropicrin are possible by injecting soil fumigants deeper in soil.
KW - 1,3-dichloropropene
KW - Aerodynamic gradient method
KW - Bare soil
KW - CALPUFF dispersion model
KW - Chloropicrin
KW - Emissions
KW - Field experiment
KW - Industrial Source Complex Short Term model (ISCST3)
KW - Integrated horizontal flux method
KW - Shank injection
KW - Soil fumigation
KW - Theoretical profile shape method
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84964944728&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84964944728&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2016.04.042
DO - 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2016.04.042
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:84964944728
SN - 1352-2310
VL - 137
SP - 135
EP - 145
JO - Atmospheric Environment
JF - Atmospheric Environment
ER -