TY - JOUR
T1 - Effect of active workstation on energy expenditure and job performance
T2 - A systematic review and meta-analysis
AU - Cao, Chunmei
AU - Liu, Yu
AU - Zhu, Weimo
AU - Ma, Jiangjun
PY - 2016/5
Y1 - 2016/5
N2 - Background: Recently developed active workstation could become a potential means for worksite physical activity and wellness promotion. The aim of this review was to quantitatively examine the effectiveness of active workstation in energy expenditure and job performance. Methods: The literature search was conducted in 6 databases (PubMed, SPORTDiscuss, Web of Science, ProQuest, ScienceDirect, and Scopuse) for articles published up to February 2014, from which a systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted. Results: The cumulative analysis for EE showed there was significant increase in EE using active workstation [mean effect size (MES): 1.47; 95%confidence interval (CI): 1.22 to 1.72, P <.0001]. Results from job performance indicated 2 findings: (1) active workstation did not affect selective attention, processing speed, speech quality, reading comprehension, interpretation and accuracy of transcription; and (2) it could decrease the efficiency of typing speed (MES: -0.55; CI: -0.88 to -0.21, P <.001) and mouse clicking (MES: -1.10; CI: -1.29 to -0.92, P <.001). Conclusion: Active workstation could significantly increase daily PA and be potentially useful in reducing workplace sedentariness. Although some parts of job performance were significantly lower, others were not. As a result there was little effect on real-life work productivity if we made a good arrangement of job tasks.
AB - Background: Recently developed active workstation could become a potential means for worksite physical activity and wellness promotion. The aim of this review was to quantitatively examine the effectiveness of active workstation in energy expenditure and job performance. Methods: The literature search was conducted in 6 databases (PubMed, SPORTDiscuss, Web of Science, ProQuest, ScienceDirect, and Scopuse) for articles published up to February 2014, from which a systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted. Results: The cumulative analysis for EE showed there was significant increase in EE using active workstation [mean effect size (MES): 1.47; 95%confidence interval (CI): 1.22 to 1.72, P <.0001]. Results from job performance indicated 2 findings: (1) active workstation did not affect selective attention, processing speed, speech quality, reading comprehension, interpretation and accuracy of transcription; and (2) it could decrease the efficiency of typing speed (MES: -0.55; CI: -0.88 to -0.21, P <.001) and mouse clicking (MES: -1.10; CI: -1.29 to -0.92, P <.001). Conclusion: Active workstation could significantly increase daily PA and be potentially useful in reducing workplace sedentariness. Although some parts of job performance were significantly lower, others were not. As a result there was little effect on real-life work productivity if we made a good arrangement of job tasks.
KW - Effect size
KW - Health benefit
KW - Physical activity
KW - Work productivity
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84977631126&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84977631126&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1123/jpah.2014-0565
DO - 10.1123/jpah.2014-0565
M3 - Article
C2 - 26551924
AN - SCOPUS:84977631126
VL - 13
SP - 562
EP - 571
JO - Journal of Physical Activity and Health
JF - Journal of Physical Activity and Health
SN - 1543-3080
IS - 5
ER -