Educational Fiscal Policy and Judicial Deference

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

By virtue of their offices, educational administrators more often than notfind themselves on the side of the defendant state or local education agencies in school litigation. Most administrators regard much of the educational litigation as judicial encroachment on their prerogatives. Ironically, over the long run, such litigation has served to expand educational opportunities and to provide rationale for increased financing of the public schools. This review takes the position that current political trends toward a more conservative judiciary are harmful to expansion of educational opportunity and that judicial deference to administrative authority tends to be educationally counterproductive.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)131-149
Number of pages19
JournalEducational Administration Quarterly
Volume18
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 1982
Externally publishedYes

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Education
  • Public Administration

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Educational Fiscal Policy and Judicial Deference'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this