Economically optimal plant density for machine-harvested edamame

Daljeet S. Dhaliwal, Martin M. Williams

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review


Consumer demand for edamame [Glycine max (L.) Merr.], the vegetable version of soybean (Glycine max), has grown during the past decade in North America. Domestic production of edamame is on the rise; however, research to guide fundamental crop production practices, including knowledge useful for developing appropriate recommendations for crop seeding rate, is lacking. Field experiments near Urbana, IL, were used to quantify edamame response to plant density and determine the economically optimal plant density (EOPD) of machine-harvested edamame. Crop growth and yield responses to a range of plant densities (24,700 to 395,100 plants/ha) were quantified in four edamame cultivars (AGS 292, BeSweet 292, Gardensoy 42, and Midori Giant) across 2 years. Plots were harvested with the Oxbo BH100, a fresh market bean harvester. In general, as plant density increased, branch number and the ratio of pod mass to vegetative mass decreased, while plant height and leaf area index increased. Recovery, the percent of marketable pods in the machine-harvested sample, varied among cultivars from 86% to 95%. Results identified the EOPD for machine-harvested edamame ranged from 87,000 to 120,000 plants/ha. When considering the effect of plant density on plant morphology, as well as seeding cost, harvester efficiency, recovery, and marketable pod yield, edamame EOPDs are considerably lower than seeding rates of up to 344,200 seeds/ha recommended in recent publications.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)368-373
Number of pages6
Issue number3
StatePublished - Mar 1 2020
Externally publishedYes


  • Economic analysis
  • Glycine max
  • Oxbo BH100 harvester
  • Seeding rate

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Horticulture

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Economically optimal plant density for machine-harvested edamame'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this