TY - JOUR
T1 - Ecological infrastructures across Mediterranean agroecosystems: Towards an effective tool for evaluating their ecological quality
AU - Rosas-Ramos, Natalia
AU - Banos-Picon, Laura
AU - Trivellone, Valeria
AU - Moretti, Marco
AU - Tormos, Jose
AU - Asis, Josep D.
N1 - Funding Information:
The authors wish to thank to the reviewers for their helpful discussions and comments on the first draft of the manuscript. The study was funded by the University of Salamanca (Programa I: USAL2015/18 ; USAL2017 ; Programa XIII: Financiación de Grupos de Investigación Reconocidos). Natalia Rosas Ramos was funded by a “Predoctoral contract” (Universidad de Salamanca – Banco Santander ).
Funding Information:
The authors wish to thank to the reviewers for their helpful discussions and comments on the first draft of the manuscript. The study was funded by the University of Salamanca (Programa I: USAL2015/18; USAL2017; Programa XIII: Financiación de Grupos de Investigación Reconocidos). Natalia Rosas Ramos was funded by a “Predoctoral contract” (Universidad de Salamanca – Banco Santander).
Publisher Copyright:
© 2019
Copyright:
Copyright 2019 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
PY - 2019/7
Y1 - 2019/7
N2 - The development of reliable evaluation schemes is essential to assess the status of biodiversity, particularly under the current scenario of biodiversity loss across agroecosystems. In these areas, ecological infrastructures contribute heavily to enhance biodiversity and underlying services, and their contribution depends on their ecological quality. Based on the questionnaire by Boller et al. (2004) for temperate areas, we propose a reliable tool for evaluating the ecological quality of woodland patches, hedges and grass strips associated with Mediterranean agroecosystems (simplified questionnaire). Since management practices and organism composition vary across geographical regions, the implementation of evaluation tools adapted to other geographical regions is deemed necessary. The development of the simplified questionnaire followed a five-steps' approach: (i) application of the Boller's questionnaire in the field; (ii) Boller's questionnaire adaptation; (iii) development of the simplified questionnaire through the assessment and simplification of Boller's questionnaire; (iv) evaluation of the simplified questionnaire effectiveness; (v) proposal of plant indicator species associated to the different quality levels obtained from applying the simplified questionnaire as an additional tool for quality assessment that complements such questionnaire. A total of 482 ecological infrastructures were evaluated in La Rioja (Spain) using the Boller's questionnaire, and their vegetation assessed by inventorying their floristic composition. We analyzed the relationship between plant species richness, as a proxy of the overall biodiversity, and the different items included in the Boller's questionnaire. According to these results, a new questionnaire was proposed, in which only variables significantly related to plant species richness were included. Our results showed that the quality groups established when applying our simplified questionnaire were more consistent than those obtained when using the Boller's questionnaire. Overall, 35 plant species resulted as significant indicators for the four levels of quality obtained from applying the simplified questionnaire. We point out that the assessment tool based on simplified questionnaire is straightforward and easy to apply by both experts and non-experts. We also propose the simplified questionnaire development procedure as a guide to create evaluation questionnaires adapted to other ecological infrastructure types.
AB - The development of reliable evaluation schemes is essential to assess the status of biodiversity, particularly under the current scenario of biodiversity loss across agroecosystems. In these areas, ecological infrastructures contribute heavily to enhance biodiversity and underlying services, and their contribution depends on their ecological quality. Based on the questionnaire by Boller et al. (2004) for temperate areas, we propose a reliable tool for evaluating the ecological quality of woodland patches, hedges and grass strips associated with Mediterranean agroecosystems (simplified questionnaire). Since management practices and organism composition vary across geographical regions, the implementation of evaluation tools adapted to other geographical regions is deemed necessary. The development of the simplified questionnaire followed a five-steps' approach: (i) application of the Boller's questionnaire in the field; (ii) Boller's questionnaire adaptation; (iii) development of the simplified questionnaire through the assessment and simplification of Boller's questionnaire; (iv) evaluation of the simplified questionnaire effectiveness; (v) proposal of plant indicator species associated to the different quality levels obtained from applying the simplified questionnaire as an additional tool for quality assessment that complements such questionnaire. A total of 482 ecological infrastructures were evaluated in La Rioja (Spain) using the Boller's questionnaire, and their vegetation assessed by inventorying their floristic composition. We analyzed the relationship between plant species richness, as a proxy of the overall biodiversity, and the different items included in the Boller's questionnaire. According to these results, a new questionnaire was proposed, in which only variables significantly related to plant species richness were included. Our results showed that the quality groups established when applying our simplified questionnaire were more consistent than those obtained when using the Boller's questionnaire. Overall, 35 plant species resulted as significant indicators for the four levels of quality obtained from applying the simplified questionnaire. We point out that the assessment tool based on simplified questionnaire is straightforward and easy to apply by both experts and non-experts. We also propose the simplified questionnaire development procedure as a guide to create evaluation questionnaires adapted to other ecological infrastructure types.
KW - INHS
KW - Green infrastructure
KW - Grass strip
KW - Woodland patch
KW - Biodiversity
KW - Hedgerow
KW - Evaluation questionnaires
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85063319830&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85063319830&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.agsy.2019.03.017
DO - 10.1016/j.agsy.2019.03.017
M3 - Article
SN - 0308-521X
VL - 173
SP - 355
EP - 363
JO - Agricultural Systems
JF - Agricultural Systems
ER -