Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

EBITDA Add-backs in Debt Contracting: A Step Too Far?

  • Miguel Faria-e-Castro
  • , Radhakrishnan Gopalan
  • , Avantika Pal
  • , Juan M. Sanchez
  • , Vijay Yerramilli

Research output: Working paper

Abstract

Financial covenants in syndicated loan agreements often rely on definitions of EBITDA that deviate from the GAAP definition. We document the increased usage of non-GAAP addbacks to EBITDA in recent times. Using the 2013 Interagency Guidance on Leveraged Lending, which we argue led to an exogenous increase in non-GAAP EBITDA addbacks, we show that these addbacks increase the likelihood of loan delinquency and default, and also increase the likelihood of the borrower experiencing a ratings downgrade. Greater use of non-GAAP EBITDA addbacks also makes it more likely that lead arrangers lower their loan share exposures through secondary market sales. Our results highlight that covenants based on customized measures of EBITDA hurt loan performance by worsening lead arrangers' incentives to monitor borrowers and by hampering their ability to take timely corrective actions.
Original languageEnglish (US)
Number of pages58
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 14 2021
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Syndicated Loans
  • Credit Agreement
  • Financial Covenant
  • EBITDA
  • Add-backs
  • GAAP
  • Leveraged Lending Guidance
  • Borrower Performance
  • Loan Performance
  • Lead Arranger
  • Lender Monitoring
  • Loan Sales

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'EBITDA Add-backs in Debt Contracting: A Step Too Far?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this