Earmarks and state appropriations for higher education

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

This study considers the relationship between federal academic earmarks and state appropriations for higher education. Often referred to as pork, federal academic earmarks are both controversial and understudied. Using a unique panel dataset which spans 1990-2006, this study conducts a panel analysis with two-way state and year-fixed effects. It finds a positive, significant relationship between federal spending on academic earmarks and state spending on higher education appropriations. The effect is large in magnitude. For every dollar increase in federal earmarks received by institutions within a state, state appropriations for higher education increase by $1.98 to $4.75, depending on the measure of appropriations used. Additional analyses show that the relationship is a recent phenomenon, appearing most strongly after 1997.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)3-23
Number of pages21
JournalJournal of Education Finance
Volume37
Issue number1
StatePublished - 2011

Fingerprint

education
dollar
Appropriation
Pork
Fixed effects
Panel analysis

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Education
  • Public Administration
  • Finance

Cite this

Earmarks and state appropriations for higher education. / Delaney, Jennifer A.

In: Journal of Education Finance, Vol. 37, No. 1, 2011, p. 3-23.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{e6c6a7ed34db4295a9b643e05d7cecbb,
title = "Earmarks and state appropriations for higher education",
abstract = "This study considers the relationship between federal academic earmarks and state appropriations for higher education. Often referred to as pork, federal academic earmarks are both controversial and understudied. Using a unique panel dataset which spans 1990-2006, this study conducts a panel analysis with two-way state and year-fixed effects. It finds a positive, significant relationship between federal spending on academic earmarks and state spending on higher education appropriations. The effect is large in magnitude. For every dollar increase in federal earmarks received by institutions within a state, state appropriations for higher education increase by $1.98 to $4.75, depending on the measure of appropriations used. Additional analyses show that the relationship is a recent phenomenon, appearing most strongly after 1997.",
author = "Delaney, {Jennifer A}",
year = "2011",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "37",
pages = "3--23",
journal = "Journal of Education Finance",
issn = "0098-9495",
publisher = "University of Illinois Press",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Earmarks and state appropriations for higher education

AU - Delaney, Jennifer A

PY - 2011

Y1 - 2011

N2 - This study considers the relationship between federal academic earmarks and state appropriations for higher education. Often referred to as pork, federal academic earmarks are both controversial and understudied. Using a unique panel dataset which spans 1990-2006, this study conducts a panel analysis with two-way state and year-fixed effects. It finds a positive, significant relationship between federal spending on academic earmarks and state spending on higher education appropriations. The effect is large in magnitude. For every dollar increase in federal earmarks received by institutions within a state, state appropriations for higher education increase by $1.98 to $4.75, depending on the measure of appropriations used. Additional analyses show that the relationship is a recent phenomenon, appearing most strongly after 1997.

AB - This study considers the relationship between federal academic earmarks and state appropriations for higher education. Often referred to as pork, federal academic earmarks are both controversial and understudied. Using a unique panel dataset which spans 1990-2006, this study conducts a panel analysis with two-way state and year-fixed effects. It finds a positive, significant relationship between federal spending on academic earmarks and state spending on higher education appropriations. The effect is large in magnitude. For every dollar increase in federal earmarks received by institutions within a state, state appropriations for higher education increase by $1.98 to $4.75, depending on the measure of appropriations used. Additional analyses show that the relationship is a recent phenomenon, appearing most strongly after 1997.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=80052185488&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=80052185488&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:80052185488

VL - 37

SP - 3

EP - 23

JO - Journal of Education Finance

JF - Journal of Education Finance

SN - 0098-9495

IS - 1

ER -